08/1796 - Preliminary Building Approval - Roofed Patio [As Published] · 172008.1796

INTI EGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 : {DAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

 

WILD'RIVER‘AREA

4.15 | Is any of the operational work proposed to be cared outina va wid tiver area declared under the Wild River Act 2005?
[No-Gotoosts [1 Yes

It yes, is the proposed operational work for the following and also declared under the wild river declaration for the areas to be

 

 

assessable?
(}) Agricultural activities as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2005 LINo Yes
(i) Animal husbandry activities as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2005 (No CJ Yes

If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, is any part of the premises in the wild river high preservation area?
Yes - An application for the operational work will be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment Manager must refuse to recelve it
{] No

“It:no, is the proposed use in relation to the production of a high risk species as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2008?
O Yes - An application for the operational work will be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive It.
O] No + Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, the Assessment Manager must refuse to

receive it (Complete Form 1, Part Q if agriculture. Complete Form 1, Part A if animal husbandry) Subject to the dectaration for the ,
relevant wild river area, this application requires assessment by the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW). If NAWis not
the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

P Regulation, schedule 2, labia 2. tem 37: Wid Rivers Act 2005, sections 42, 434,

   

IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 4, Karn 1)

 

 

STATE: pect
4.16 |s any part of the premises located In part abe a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State-controlied road?
[No -Endofsections ([] Yes

tyes, is the proposed operational work associated with any of the folowing? {Tick applicable box/es)

 

(i) Amaterial change of use that is assessable under the planning scheme . go No (Yes
(ii) Reconfiguring a lot that increases the total number ot lots, or increases the total number oflots []No (7) Yes
abutting the State-controlled road 4

>

If no to either or both (i) or (ii) above, and answers to questions in this section of the checklist indicate the proposed
operational work is assessable under IPA, schedule 8 - Answer (a) - (c) below.

fa). is any of the proposed operational work associated with access to a State-controlled road?
CJ No Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.

(b) !s any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation?
No C1 Yes

If yes, is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road not defined by route?
oO No - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMA) as Concurrence Agency.
oO YesS - This application must be referred to the DMR as Advice Agency.

(c) Does any of the proposed operational work involve the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land,
through a pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625cm? that directs stormwater to a State-controlled road?
CJ) No (Yes
Hiyes, is-the operational work proposed ina tuiure Siate-conirolled road not defined by route?
Oo No - This application must be reterred to the Department of Main Roads (OMR) as Concurrence Agency.
O YeS - This application must be referred to the DMR as Advice Agency.

iF Regulation, scteduls 2, table 2. tain 3,

 

 

 

 

Page 38