Original source · versioned page text
2018-07-10 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.1 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 JULY 2018
Page 25 of 71
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 JULY 2018
Parking Management:
a ee ee EERIE)
1. Reduce * Most likely to encourage modal + Will require improvements to
parking supply shift and traffic congestion sustainable transport modes
* Opportunity for improvements to * May reduce economic viability in
public realm and increase shorter term
capacity for pedestrians (people
place)
2. Increased * Supply meets demand * Likely to increase traffic
parking supply congestion in Hastings St precinct
+ Potentially expensive to achieve,
and may be unnecessary in long
term
* Limited mode shift
3. Congestion + Will also charge through traffic + Less acceptable to community
charge * Most successful in encouraging + Technology required may be
modal shift and reducing traffic expensive and requires all users
congestion including tourists to access
* Opportunity for improvements to * | May reduce economic viability
public realm and increase
capacity for pedestrians (people
place)
4. Time limited + Minor improvements required to * Less compliance with time limits
car parking manage supply compared to paid parking
with increased + Limited change required * Increased staff costs to enforce
enforcement * Less likely to reduce demand and
(improved therefore circulation of cars
status-quo) looking for a car park
* Less likely to deter people from
moving their car around or
encourage modal shift ml |
5. Paid + User pays system * Less equitable for low income and |
Parking * Increases turnover of spaces other disadvantaged groups
+ Reduces demand and mode shift + Need for payment system which
* Reduces circulation may not meet Noosa’s look and
* Generates revenue feel (but options are available)
* Improves compliance with time * Less likely to be popular with all
limits users
* More efficient use of existing supply °* _ Initial investment to install
* Lower operating cost compared to
increased enforcement, as self
enforcing | J
6. Increased * Reduces misuse of car park time * Increased staff costs
enforcement limits * Lower compliance compared to
+ Improves usage of supply paid parking
+ Can generate revenue * Less likely to reduce demand and
encourage mode shift
Page 25 of 71See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.