Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Spit SEMP Final Report 3
Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion
2 Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion
2.1 Introduction
The findings from an analysis of historical shoreline movements in the mouth of the Noosa River are
presented in this section, including:
• An update to the conceptual understanding of shoreline recession at The Spit and Dog Beach
based on recent observations;
• An evaluation of the current shoreline erosion management strategy;
• The estimated rate of shoreline recession at Dog Beach and the potential timeframe for a
breakthrough event if left untreated; and
• Identification of potential entrance configuration scenarios to be assessed with the numerical
modelling developed for the SEMP and presented in Chapter 3.
2.2 Previous Assessments
The Noosa Spit area was largely established by the construction of the Noosa River training wall,
starting in 1978. The historical movements of the channels and sand shoals in the mouth of the
Noosa River have previously been described by Tomlinson and Chamberlain (2006). That study
qualitatively considered aerial imagery captured between May 1972 and January 2002.
Migration of the river channels occurs in response to tidal flows and weather conditions, dominant
seasonal wind directions and catchment rainfall contributing to riverine flows. Tomlinson and
Chamberlain (2006) indicate that prior to the late 1960’s, the Noosa River channel entrance tended
to re-establish following storm or flood events in a “more direct south-eastern channel and migration
of the entrance to a more easterly position” (i.e. the approximate vicinity of Noosa Woods). Historical
imagery only captures the internal channels downstream of Munna Point running close to the
northern bank, although the lack of vegetation on the extensive sand shoals elsewhere in the river
mouth indicates highly mobile sand deposits.
The continual movement and re-establishment of the channel close to the centre of the historical
river mouth opening reflects the complexity of combined impacts of flood and tidal flows, along with
longshore sediment transport continually supplying sand to the area.
The formalisation of Hayes Island in the early 1970’s and the subsequent construction of the Noosa
River training wall in 1978 now restricts the channel to the northern half of the historical river mouth.
An assessment of erosion at The Spit was made by International Coastal Management (ICM) in 2010
(ICM 2010a). That assessment included observations of manual interference to restrict channel
movements, such as the placement of dredged sand to close the channel immediately adjacent to
the spit prior to 2005 (see Figure 2-1). It is unclear how frequently this dredging was undertaken, or
the source of the dredged sand.
In addition, several structures have been installed to mitigate erosion, including an extension of the
southern training wall, and two geofabric sand container structures (one submerged) at each end of
Dog Beach. These are described and considered further in Section 2.4.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.