Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1

of 109

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
 Noosa Spit SEMP Final Report                                                                                95
 Shoreline Erosion Mitigation Options




4.3.6    Option 5: shore parallel seawall
         The indicative minimum footprint for construction of a shore parallel seawall (or similar coastal
         protection structure) is illustrated in Figure 4-17. This footprint is defined by a ~20 m buffer from the
         HAT contour on the southern side of The Spit, noting that the actual footprint would need to be
         determined as part of a concept and detailed design study. It may be possible to construct the seawall
         in stages; however, this would need to be carefully planned given the restricted access for land-
         based equipment.

         Regarding effectiveness, a properly designed and constructed seawall is expected to reduce the risk
         of a breakthrough to an acceptable level. The whole of life cost estimate for this option is $4.1M with
         annualised costs around $200,000/year. This includes beach nourishment as part of the capital
         costs.

         This option accepts the ongoing loss of dune and terrestrial habitat to erosion and would likely cause
         further losses during the construction phase.

         The social values associated with Dog Beach would be gradually lost. Ongoing nourishment of the
         shoreline could be used to maintain beach amenity in front of the seawall; however, the seawall
         would be designed to be stable in a fully exposed condition (that is, beach nourishment would not be
         required for the structure to perform as intended).

         The risks to Council are generally low to medium and manageable. The exception being the relatively
         large investment of public funds and the perception of benefiting a small number of private properties.
         Full details of the risk assessment results are provided in Appendix D.




 G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
Log in to download the original file

2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1(PDF, 18MB).pdf · 18.5 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.