Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Noosa Spit SEMP Final Report 13
Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion
2.4 Current Shoreline Erosion Strategy
The current erosion management strategy at Dog Beach consists of several elements originally
proposed by ICM (2010a) and illustrated in Figure 2-2. Construction of Stage 1 of the strategy was
completed in 2013, and consisted of:
• A training wall comprised of geofabric sand containers and rock seawall at the western end of
Dog Beach;
• A partially submerged breakwater constructed with geofabric sand containers at the eastern end
of Dog Beach; and
• Beach nourishment and sand deposition in the southern channel (associated with construction of
the structures).
The training wall and seawall have fixed the position of the western end of The Spit, and the training
wall has acted as a groyne to intercept sediments carried upstream on the flood tide. Since
construction works were undertaken, the western most 140 m of the beach has progressively
accreted immediately east of the training wall. A large and near-permanently deep scour hole to
approximately -9 mAHD has formed at the north-western tip of the structure, which also acts as a
control point for the southern channel. However, in the centre of Dog Beach, southward channel
migration has continued relatively unimpeded. It is noted that the scour depth is 3.1 m below the
founding level indicated on the design drawings (ICM, 2010b) and may ultimately lead to a slumping
failure of the structure1.
At the eastern end of the channel, the submerged breakwater was largely buried by sand following
construction, but since late 2017 is clearly fully visible in aerial imagery, and a scour pocket to -7
mAHD has developed on the northern side of the groyne. This scour depth is 1.2 m below the
founding level of the submerged breakwater indicated on the design drawings (ICM, 2010b) and has
caused slumping, with the breakwater crest also approximately 1 m below the design level. This
observation would suggest that the structure is not performing as intended. Aside from minor
localised changes around the time of construction in the immediate vicinity of the main beach access
point, there has been minimal change in shoreline position since 2011.
While Stage 1 of the shoreline strategy appears to have been successful in stabilising the shoreline
at the eastern and western ends of Dog Beach, it must be noted that the period from construction
(2013) to 2017 coincided with non-dominance of the southern channel. Since the southern channel
reasserted dominance in 2017, the nourishment material has been lost from the beach and erosion
of established vegetation is now re-occurring (refer Figure 2-3).
1
A structural integrity assessment of the training wall has not been undertaken as part of the SEMP.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.