Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Noosa Spit SEMP Final Report 16
Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion
Stage 1 of the shoreline strategy is considered to have been partially successful in stabilising Noosa
Spit. The remaining stages of the shoreline erosion management strategy involve an extension of
the partially submerged groyne and the installation of two smaller conventional groynes.
While these elements may ultimately assist in successfully retaining a beach, it is considered that:
• The founding levels of the various structures will need to incorporate the potential for undermining
from the southern channel (i.e. they may need to be significantly deeper and therefore larger and
more expensive structures than originally intended); and
• Ongoing exposure to flows in the southern channel would be expected to generate scour points
at the structures (like those already observed), causing artificial deepening of the channel, and
possibly encouraging natural retention or re-establishment of the southern channel in this
location.
2.4.1 Recent Shoreline Recession
Shoreline recession at Dog Beach is not occurring linearly and is dependent on the continued
dominance of the southern channel. In addition, The Spit has changed shape and orientation over
time, and artificial nourishment of the beach and within the flow channels have influenced beach
width.
The assessment of shoreline changes seeks to clarify the understanding of:
• Erosion of The Spit, particularly in relation to width and vulnerability to breakthrough; and
• Availability of a beach for recreational use.
2.4.1.1 Movement of vegetated shoreline
To provide a reliable assessment of shoreline movements along Dog Beach, measurements of
vegetation lines relative to a fixed location or ‘baseline’ at Hayes Island (now known as Noosa Sound)
have been made. In addition, the narrowest part of The Spit has been measured. Note that although
this location varied slightly from year to year, it was consistently in the same vicinity.
Measurement locations are shown in Figure 2-4, and actual measurements are reported in Table
2-2. The monitoring lines used in this project have deliberately not been established perpendicular
to the shoreline as The Spit has been slowly changing shape over time – a line perpendicular to the
2019 shoreline is not perpendicular to the shorelines from the 1980’s and 1990’s. The lines have
therefore been established on a north-south orientation and linked to readily identifiable landmarks.
This also reduces confusion for future measurements and supports a rapid and simple assessment
of future changes.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.