Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Spit SEMP Final Report 18
Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion
Table 2-2 Noosa Spit Width Measurements
Width (m)
Narrowest
Year Point 1 Point 2
Point 3 Point 4 part
(western (central
(central east) (eastern end) (between
end) west)
points 3 & 4)
1982 128 118 66 163 57
1986 170 129 68 174 67
1990 161 177 219 191 89
1994 252 166 210 187 81
1996 245 162 208 186 83
2004 194 163 212 211 87
2010 96 140 189 141 72
2011 82 133 185 140 62
2013 58 138 182 113 60
2014 59 134 178 122 64
2015 61 139 181 134 61
2016 63 136 176 120 65
2017 48 136 181 129 62
2017 47 129 181 114 65
2018 52 129 178 117 63
2019 48 128 178 114 64
The Spit width measurements indicate that recession is most evident towards the western end.
Localised narrowing observed at Point 1 is largely attributed to end scour from the training wall and
rock wall on the southern side of The Spit. Recession appears to occur sporadically and is most likely
associated with the occurrence of strong river currents during spring tide periods.
Of more concern is the recession observed at Point 2. Figure 2-5 shows the spit width at each
measuring location since Stage 1 of the shoreline strategy was implemented, along with the
associated trend line (dotted) for each location. The measurements confirm that while the southern
channel was not dominant (i.e. prior to 2017), the shoreline was relatively stable. However, since the
southern channel became dominant, recession at this location has recommenced. If the southern
channel remains the dominant channel over the next ten years, recession at Point 2 in the order of
20 m could be expected.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.