Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Spit SEMP Final Report 41
Numerical Modelling of Entrance Configurations
3.6 Entrance Configuration Assessment
The Model has been used to investigate historical and conceptual river entrance configuration and
the relationship with erosion potential at Dog Beach and lower river water levels under normal tidal
conditions. In addition to the ‘existing’ (2019) case the following scenarios were considered:
• 1986/87 ‘east-west’ aligned entrance channel condition, informed by historical aerial imagery.
• 2010 ‘northeast-southwest’ aligned entrance channel condition, informed by historical aerial
imagery and bathymetric survey data provided by Council.
• Dog Beach breakthrough entrance condition, hypothetical breakthrough to Noosa Sound.
• Post 1 in 100 (1%) Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) river flood entrance condition, input
design river flow conditions informed by the Noosa River Flood Study (WMA Water, 2017).
The model representations of these bathymetric/morphological conditions are shown in
The testing of each scenario involved the following steps:
(3) Update of the model bathymetry using the bathymetric representation of the entrance
configuration of interest. In the case of the flood event, this involved simulating the
morphological response to the design river flow with the 2019 bathymetry used to define the
model ‘initial condition’.
(4) One-month simulation of sediment transport and morphology under typical tidal conditions.
This allows the modelled bed to ‘warm-up’.
(5) Simulation of ‘normal’ spring and neap tidal conditions to understand the system response to
the morphological change.
The key findings are presented below and have been summarised using maps that illustrate the
‘impact’ (or difference) relative to the entrance condition in March/April 2019.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.