Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Noosa Spit SEMP Final Report 52
Numerical Modelling of Entrance Configurations
3.6.2 Impact to Current Magnitude at Dog Beach
Maps showing the impact to peak tidal current magnitude are shown in Figure 3-20 to Figure 3-27
and indicate the following:
• Comparison between the existing and 1987 entrance condition suggest significantly reduced
erosion pressure at Dog Beach in 1987. During this period the Dog Beach channel was shoaled
and the dominant flow channel was central during peak flood tide conditions (Figure 3-20) and to
the north during peak ebb tide conditions (Figure 3-21).
• The erosion pressure at the western extent of Dog Beach was greater in 2010 compared to the
existing condition, particularly during peak flood tide conditions (Figure 3-22). This area has since
been stabilised by the geofabric sand container training wall constructed in 2013. The existing
peak ebb tide currents through the middle section of the Dog Beach channel are greater in
magnitude compared to 2010 (Figure 3-23). This demonstrates the ongoing dominance of the
Dog Beach channel and implies that the works completed in 2013 are only reducing erosion
pressure along a limited section of shoreline, updrift of the training wall during the flood phase of
the tide.
• The breakthrough condition leads to greater current magnitudes at the eastern end of Dog Beach
during both flood (Figure 3-24) and ebb (Figure 3-25) tide phases. The distribution of currents
suggests the potential for rapid morphological change at the Spit following a breakthrough event.
The Noosa Woods area would be expected to narrow overtime and lead to further loss of coastal
land that protects Noosa Sound and Hasting Street.
• Following a major flood event, the erosion pressure at Dog Beach associated with tidal currents
is reduced in comparison to the existing condition (Figure 3-26 and Figure 3-27). Scour during
the river flooding creates a dominant central channel and reduces flow throughout the Dog Beach
channel during flood and ebb tide phases.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.