Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Minor Change Assessment Report

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

  230578-604         05    Level 1 Planting Plan: Sheet 4, prepared by Place Design         23.10.25
                           Group
  230578-901         04    Details, prepared by Place Design Group                          31.01.25

JUSTIFICATION FOR PROPOSED CHANGE TO APPROVAL
The proposed change is considered to satisfy the definition of a Minor Change, as the proposed change
does not cause:

    ●​ The inclusion of prohibited development in the application;
    ●​ Referral to a referral agency if there were no referral agencies for the development application;
    ●​ Referral to extra referral agencies;
    ●​ A referral agency, in assessing the application under s55(2), to assess the application against, or
       have regard to, a matter, other than a matter the referral agency must have assessed the
       application against, or had regard to when the application was made; or
    ●​ Public notification to be triggered.

In determining whether the proposed Minor Change would result in a substantially different development,
the assessment manager must consider the individual circumstances of the development, in the context
of the change proposed. A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if
any of the following criteria are not met for the proposed change:

4.1 Involves a new use.

The requested Minor Change does not involve a new use for the site. The proposal will be maintained for
8x Multiple Dwellings.

4.2 Results in the application applying to a new parcel of land.

No new land parcels are proposed to be included or excluded from the development.

4.3 Dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance.

The proposed changes will not result in change in the scale, bulk and appearance that is dramatically
different to the current built form to what has currently been approved. The proposal seeks to refine
design elements and finishes prior to construction commencing.

4.4 Changes the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended.

The proposed Minor Change does not affect the ability of the approved development to operate as
intended.

4.5 Removes a component that is integral to the operation of the development.

The proposed change to the existing approval does not remove a component that is integral to the
operation of the development.

4.6 Significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic
to the site.

The proposed change will not significantly impact the existing traffic flow and transport network. As
outlined above, the proposal seeks to maintain existing vehicular access to the basement level from
Avocet Parade. On-site car parking is maintained as per Condition 36 of the approval.



                                                                                                        5
Log in to download the original file

Minor Change Assessment Report.pdf · 4.0 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.