Original source · versioned page text
2022-04-19 General Committee Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 19 APRIL 2022 4 MCU17/0076.01 – APPLICATION FOR AN OTHER CHANGE TO A DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR MULTIPLE HOUSING TYPE 2 DUPLEX TO INCLUDE SHORT-TERM ACCOMMODATION & OPERATIONAL WORKS AT 1/25 EDWARD STREET, NOOSAVILLE Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Jurisevic Seconded: Cr Wegener That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 12 April 2022 regarding Application No. MCU17/0076.01 and OPW17/0224.01 for an Other Change to a Development Permit for Material Change of Use – Multiple Housing Type 2 Duplex & Short-term accommodation & Operational Works, situated at 1/25 Edward St Noosaville and: A. Refuse the application for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is not consistent with 3.2.4 Housing to meet diverse needs of the community and 3.3.3 Housing Choice (n) of the Strategic Framework, as it will further erode the permanent housing in the area, impacting permanent resident amenity. 2. The proposal is not consistent with 6.3.2.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (2)(a) and (h) of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code as: a. The proposal is located in an area that has a substantial number of properties being used for visitor accommodation and/or properties permitted for visitor accommodation. The introduction of additional short- term accommodation within a duplex is not consistent with the purpose of the zone. b. The proposal seeks to establish a new short-term visitor accommodation facility within a recently approved dual occupancy and is not located within a well-established resort or holiday units. 3. The proposal is not consistent with 7.2.4.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (2)(t) and Performance Outcome PO21 of the Noosaville Local Plan Code as: a. Additional visitor accommodation in the area is likely to result in detrimental impacts on the residential amenity of permanent residents. b. While the code seeks to maintain visitor accommodation in the area, it does not seek to increase the extent of visitor accommodation within the area to the detriment of permanent residents. 4. The proposal is not consistent with 9.3.5.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (1) and (2)(f) of the Visitor Accommodation Code as: a. The proposed visitor accommodation is not appropriately located and integrated with permanent residents in the area given the number and density of properties currently being used for visitor accommodation and/or permitted for visitor accommodation. b. The proposed visitor accommodation is likely to detract from the amenity enjoyed by residents. 5. There is no need for additional short-term accommodation in the area. 6. The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO12 of the Visitor Accommodation Code and Performance Outcome PO6 of the Driveway and Parking Code as insufficient car parking is proposed on site to address the likely parking demands on site. B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016. Page 6 of 39
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.