Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

2308-CalileSubmission

Attached to the e-mail PM Submission - Tiago Guerreiro - 132008.176.05.

of 3

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Notice of Submission

16 August 2023

To:       Assessment Manager
          Noosa Council

RE:       Application No. 132008.176.05
          3&7 Serenity Cl Noosa Heads Qld 4567
          Development – MCU – Resort and Shop

Dear Assessment Manager,

In regards to the aforementioned development application I make the following submission:

          The proposed resort is a welcome addition to the Noosa community and I generally
          support the scheme being approved subject to a more thorough traffic review and upgrade
          the road network namely; the reconnection of Banksia Ave North and Banksia Ave to
          vehicles.

On review of the submitted Traffic Report (TTM Traffic Engineering Report Ref 22BRT022 RP01_1)
there are some glaring mis-calculation and assumption errors.

      a) Section 7 Development Transport Demand
             a. 7.2.1 Traffic Generation
             • The RTA data being referenced for modelling is dated from 2002.
             • 21 year old data grossly underestimates actual current and future traffic. Real data
                 from Grant St should be collected and used as the base for modelling such a critical
                 development ensuring seasonal peak demands are also accounted.
Log in to download the original file

2308-CalileSubmission.pdf · 272 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

b. 7.2.2 Traffic Distribution
• There is another error in the modelling, only 50% of the development traffic has
   been accounted see figure 7.1 this error has a significant impact of the modelling
   and needs to be addressed.

Page 3

    b) Section 9 Traffic Impact Assessment
           a. 9.2 Analysis of Grant St / Noosa Dr / Sunshine Beach Rd
           • SIDRA Defualt values were used for modelling again grossly underestimating actual
               traffic flows.
           • Even with default values the worst affected street is Grant St and a development of
               this scale does need an alternate access which can only be provided by opening
               Coral Tree Ave to Bankisa Ave to Banksia Ave North


In conclusion is is clear that the traffic report submitted is inadequate and grossly underestimates the
volumes of traffic this proposed development will attract. Given there is a great example already of
this type of development in James St Brisbane the Council should be requesting more accurate
modelling and requesting the development contribute to the upgrade and reconnection of the
Banksia Avenues.

Sincerely


Maria Guerreiro
16 Grant St, Noosa Heads Qld 4567

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.