Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - Site Investigation and Slab Report
Likewise, the principles apply in mine subsidence movement. Measures intended to provide more
areas (particularly in areas where long-wall mining consistent foundation conditions include:
methods are used) as the ground movements are ■ Draining surface water away from the building to
similar to those encountered on reactive clay soils. prevent ponding adjacent to footings.
However, items such as the required joint width and ■ Providing ‘apron’ paths around perimeter walls
spacing will need to be calculated to confirm that to better control and provide more consistent
the details contained herein are appropriate for the moisture levels within the soil adjacent to the
expected ground movement. footings.
While articulation joints normally apply to ■ Avoiding large trees or thick shrubbery nearby
masonry walls, framed walls (referred to as clad that locally draw moisture from the soil and
frame in AS 28701) which are more flexible than cause uneven and often large soil movements.
masonry walls may also benefit from articulation. ■ Providing flexible drainage connections to
The location and spacing of articulation joints for prevent water leakage near footings.
clad frame walls are similar to those recommended
for masonry walls. These and other practical measures are
While every individual situation where an outlined in Foundation Maintenance and Footing
articulation joint is required can not be covered Performance: A Homeowner’s Guide3.
because of the variety of wall and window/door
opening combinations, this document provides 3 FOUNDATION AND BUILDING MOVEMENT
guidelines for the location and detailing of The foundation is the ground that supports the
articulation joints. building and the footing is the construction
(concrete slab, strip, pad or piers) which transfers
2 INTRODUCTION the load from the building to the foundation.
Masonry walls – whether built of bricks or blocks, Footings may be designed to either restrict
made of fired clay, concrete or sand/lime – are or accommodate movements that occur in the
rigid and brittle. They can thus tolerate only minor foundation soil. For small buildings constructed on
footing movement without cracking and/or causing soils that shrink or swell (reactive sites) it is usually
windows and doors to become jammed. uneconomical to attempt to design a rigid footing
Unpainted masonry walls incorporating cement/ system to avoid transmission of any significant
lime mortar are the most tolerant of movement, movement to the superstructure. It is better to
and any cracking in the mortar joints tends to be design the footing system to allow a limited amount
inconspicuous. In rendered and/or painted walls, of movement, and a superstructure that can tolerate
cracking may be visually unacceptable, even though that movement.
structural performance is unimpaired. Generally, the more reactive the soil is the more
The solution is to provide footings that are rigid rigid the footings need to be in order to ensure the
enough or to articulate the walls; the latter will acceptable performance of the structure above.
usually be the more economical solution as more If brittle elements such as masonry walls which
flexible footings can be used. Articulation involves are susceptible to cracking due to movement are
dividing the walls into panels separated by vertical articulated, the risk of cracking will be minimised,
joints that allow movement and thus reduce the risk and less-rigid footings than those needed for
of cracking. non‑articulated buildings will be adequate.
Footing movement is typically caused by Deemed-to-comply or standard footing systems
swelling and shrinking of the foundation material. for soils of varying reactivity are detailed in AS 2870.
Thus the risk of movement depends on the extent Apart from full masonry on Class H sites, for which
to which the foundation soil reacts to changes articulation is mandatory, options are given for
in moisture content. AS 2870 classifies sites in either articulated or non-articulated masonry
accordance with the soil’s reactivity in a range from construction for various site classes. On stable sites
Class A (stable) to Class E (extremely reactive). The (Class A) and slightly reactive sites (Class S) no
Building Code of Australia (BCA)2 requires that concession in footing size is allowed for articulated
houses on all sites other than Class A and Class S masonry veneer walling. On Class S sites there is a
(slightly reactive) incorporate articulated walls. concession for articulated full masonry. Note that
It is important to note that articulation of the the acceptable construction provisions of the BCA
walls of a building does not replace the need to require articulation on all site classes other than
adopt other measures which are essential when Class A and S.
building on reactive-soil sites to further reduce the
risk of cracking to masonry walls from foundation
Page 2 Articulated Walling
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.