Original source · versioned page text
2016-12-12 General Committee - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Biodiversity Assessment Report
The original of this document is very large (11.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Noosa Biodiversity Plan – Biodiversity Assessment Report human infrastructure, as well as by steep land (Low, 2011). Saltmarshes are vulnerable to complete loss of habitat, especially when bounded on the upper slope by cliff lines or coastal development (Steffen et al., 2009, Low, 2011). In addition, mangrove encroachment on saltmarshes may occur more rapidly than saltmarsh expansion into higher land, which may be occupied by paperbark forests, freshwater sedgelands, or urban areas, resulting in a contraction of the saltmarsh zone until some decades after future sea levels stabilised (Low, 2011). The extent of mangrove invasion of saltmarshes will be determined by localised rainfall changes (Low, 2011). Mangrove encroachment into saltmarshes is currently occurring at various locations in Queensland and this process, in combination with barriers to landward movement, suggests that climate change will reduce the extent of saltmarsh in many areas (Low, 2011). It is likely that mangroves will benefit from this process (Low, 2011). One of the wetland ecosystems that is most at-risk from climate change impacts is the freshwater wetlands found immediately upslope of saline wetlands, which form much of the coastline of Queensland e.g. paperbark Melaleuca spp. woodlands, and wetlands dominated by spike rush Eleocharis dulcis (Low, 2011). Birds and flying foxes that feed on the nectar of paperbarks Melaleuca spp. growing in low-lying swampy areas will also be impacted, where these vegetation communities are unable to migrate upslope (Low, 2011). In southern Queensland, the low-lying Melaleuca quinquinervia are a critical winter-spring nectar source for flying foxes and honeyeaters, which are crucial pollinators for these and other dominant tree species in the area (Low, 2011). More frequent vegetation die-backs Noosa Shire contains vegetation that will be more susceptible to die-back in the future. The Noosa region is expected to experience longer dry spells (Low, 2011) and 20-40% more frequent droughts by 2030, including more within-year droughts (Low, 2011). In combination with higher temperatures, this will increase drought deaths, alter plant competitive relationships, and increase the risk of fire in some habitats (Steffen et al., 2009). Areas that are particularly susceptible to drought-related deaths and die-backs include dune crests, ridgetops, sunny northern slopes, and rainforests where shallow soils overlay rock. Other rainforest areas are generally resilient to droughts, however, there are known examples of rainforest trees dying during drought, all in the highlands of Southeast Queensland; in Yarraman, Lamington National Park, and on Kroombit Tops (Low, 2011). Eucalypt forests in exposed areas and on shallow soils are particularly susceptible to drought (Low, 2011). Vegetation die-back, particularly in eucalypt and rainforest communities, may also occur due to cyclone and hailstorm damage, with both of these ecosystem disturbances projected to increase in frequency and intensity in the Noosa region in the future (Leslie and Karoly, 2007, SCC, 2010). Reduction or loss of native folivores Noosa Shire is home to both threatened and common folivores that are likely to decline due to a reduction in leaf nutritional content as the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere increases. Plants supplied with extra CO2 usually produce foliage with a reduced nitrogen content, and nitrogen is often the limiting resource for herbivorous mammals (Low, 2011). Consequently, mammalian folivores will need to eat more leaves to survive, which may not be possible under some circumstances, or it may lead to higher levels of exposure and predation, and parasitism (Low, 2011). In addition, increases in CO2 also lead to greater leaf thickness and the production of more secondary compounds such as phenols and tannins, which © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 131
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.