Original source · versioned page text
2016-12-12 General Committee - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Biodiversity Assessment Report
The original of this document is very large (11.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Noosa Biodiversity Plan – Biodiversity Assessment Report
The following table provides a summary of the data sources, method and scoring system. The following figure provides a flowchart of the process used to
refine spatial data and assign the scores indicated below i.e. non-remnant & urban through to remnant.
Biodiversity
Data sources Method Scoring system Data output
value
Ecological RE v 9.0 FSV & LiDAR Analysis 0 = non-remnant &
condition LiDAR (2016) • Lidar tree model to validate presence/absence of vegetation as per FSV urban*
Regrowth v 6.13 • Local mean tree height, tree height variance and topographic indices derived to 1 = non-remnant
determine signatures of REs comprising mixed polygons cleared &
Field validation data
• Lidar products used with API as part of the vegetation validation and compilation plantation
Fine Scale process illustrated below 2 = scatter trees
Vegetation (FSV)
Mapping (2012) 3 = sparse regrowth
Vegetation validation, refinement and compilation 4 = dense regrowth
• Undertaken for mixed RE polygons relating to relevant biodiversity values i.e. 5 = contiguous RE
conservation status, TEC, under-represented RE 6 = remnant
• Initial API utilising imagery and LiDAR products to divide RE polygons into Base layer attributed
homogenous REs with condition and
• Field validation for polygons unable to be split through API RE code
• Single RE designated to polygons where possible with level of certainty attributed
• Exotic Camphor Laurel stands identified where possible
Attribution
1. Urban – an urban overlay was created by selecting applicable residential,
industrial, commercial and community services zones from the IPZ zones layer.
These were buffered out, then in by 100m to remove gaps for roads. Area
attributed as ‘urban’
2. Condition attributed as per flow diagram shown below
RE code attributed as per RE v 9.0 and field validation data
* Purpose of the scoring is to provide a ranking system of all ecosystems at a broad LGA scale. It does not indicate a lack of biodiversity values within urban areas
© ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 137
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.