Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

Arbourist Report

of 7

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Australian Tree Contractors & Arboricultural Consultants
     P O Box 1411, Noosaville DC Qld 4566 E: [email protected] M: 0431586371
                              W: www.australianconsultarborist.com.au
                                 Helping Trees and People Get Along




                                                       AUSTRALIAN TREE CONTRACTORS &
                                                       ARBORICULTURAL CONSULTANTS PTY LTD
                                                       “MANAGING TREES IN THE URBAN FOREST”


                                                       Kurt Brown Dip Arb, TRAQ Certified


PAUL CLOUT DESIGN
   19 KEY COURT
NOOSA HEADS 4567




                                                                                                   --
                                                                                        APPROVED PLANS
                                                                                           OPW21/0187
                                                                                         NOOSA COUNCIL
                                                                                          20 JULY 2021
                                                                                                   -
Log in to download the original file

Arbourist Report.pdf · 1.3 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 6 pages

Page 2

     Arboricultural Report and Tree Protection Methodology / Plan
Client: Paul Clout Design
Site Address: 19 Key Court Noosa Heads 4567
Date of Inspection: 22nd of June 2021

Table of Contents
   • Professional Disclaimer
   • General References
   • Qualifications
   • Scope of Works
   • Definition
   • ARBORICULTURAL REPORT AND TREE PROTECTION METHODOLOGY.




                                                                    --
                                                             APPROVED PLANS
                                                                OPW21/0187
                                                              NOOSA COUNCIL
                                                               20 JULY 2021
                                                                    -

Page 3

Professional Disclaimer: Although Australian Tree Contractors & Arboricultural Consultants PTY Ltd
(ACN 614 266 125) (ATCAC) use all due care and skill in providing you with the information made
available in this Report, to the extent permitted by law ATCAC otherwise excludes all warranties of any
kind, either expressed or implied. To the extent permitted by law, you agree that ATCAC is not liable to
you or any other person or entity for any loss or damage caused or alleged to have been caused
(including loss or damage resulting from negligence), either directly or indirectly, by your use of the
information (including by way of example, Arboricultural advice) made available to you in this report.
Without limiting this disclaimer, in no event will ATCAC be liable to you for any lost revenue or profits,
or for special, indirect, consequential or incidental damage (however caused and regardless of the
theory of liability) arising out of or related to your use of that information, even if Tree Logic has been
advised of the possibility of such loss or damage. This disclaimer is governed by the law in force in the
State of Queensland, Australia. This Report is addressed to you and may not be distributed to, or used
or relied on by, another person without the prior written consent of ATCAC. ATCAC accepts no liability
to any other person, entity or organisation with respect to the content of this Report unless that
person, entity or organisation has first agreed in writing to the terms upon which this Report may be
relied on by that other person, entity or organisation. Report Assumptions The following qualifications
and assumptions apply to the Report: • Any legal description provided to ATCAC is assumed to be
correct. Any titles and ownership of any property are assumed to be correct. No responsibility is
assumed for matters outside of ATCAC’s control. • ATCAC assumes that any property or project is not
in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes or other local, state or federal government
regulations. • ATCAC shall take care to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data shall be
verified insofar as possible; however, ATCAC can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy
of the information provided by others not directly under ATCAC’s control. • No ATCAC employee or
contractor shall be required to give testimony or to attend court because of the Report unless
subpoenaed or subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional
fee for such services. • Loss of the report or alteration of any part of the report not undertaken by
ATCAC invalidates the entire Report and shall not be relied upon by any party. • The Report and any
values expressed therein represent the opinion of ATCAC’s consultant and ATCAC’s fee is in no way
conditional upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent
event, nor upon any finding to be reported. • Sketches, diagrams, graphs and photographs used in the
Report, is intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as
engineering or architectural drawings, reports or surveys. • Unless expressed otherwise: I) The
information contained in the Report will cover those items that were outlined in the project brief or
that were examined during the assessment and reflect the condition of those items at the time of
inspection; and ii) The inspection is limited to a visual examination of accessible components without
dissection, excavation or probing unless otherwise stipulated. • There is no warranty or guarantee,
expressed or implied by ATCAC, that the problems or deficiencies of the plants or site in question may
not arise in the future. • All instructions (verbal or written) that define the scope of the Report have
been included in the Report and all documents and other materials that the ATCAC Consultant has
been instructed to consider or to consider in preparing the Report have been included or listed within
the Report. • The Report is strictly limited to the matters stated in it and does not apply by implication
to any other matters. • To the writer’s knowledge all facts, matter and all assumptions upon which the
Report proceeds have been stated within the body of the report and all opinion contained within the
report will be fully researched and referenced and any such opinion not duly researched is based upon
the writer's experience and observations.

General References
  • Australian Standards AS 4373 – 2007 Pruning of amenity trees.
    •    AS 4970-2009 - Protection of trees on development sites
    •    Wild Plants of Greater Brisbane – Queensland Museum
    •    Fraser Coast website and Maps/overlays
    •    Evaluating Tree Defects – A Field Guide by Ed Hayes, Second Edition
    •    Body Language of Trees - Research for Amenity Trees, Claus Mattheck
                                                                                                              --
                                                                                                 APPROVED PLANS
                                                                                                    OPW21/0187
                                                                                                  NOOSA COUNCIL
                                                                                                   20 JULY 2021
                                                                                                              -

Page 4

   •   Smiley E. Thomas, Nelda Matheny and Sharon Lilly April 2012. Tree Risk
       Assessment: Levels of Assessment
   •   Matheny Nelda and Jim Clark Feb 2009. Tree Risk Assessment: What we know
       (and What We Don’t Know)
   •   The use of the TRAQ as trained by the International Society of Arboriculture

Qualifications:
   •   AQF Level 3 Arborist
   •   AQF Level 5 Arborist
   •   ISA Certified TRAQ Qualified Arborist
   •   Previous QAA Executive Committee Member 2012 – 2017
   •   President of the QAA 2014- 2016
   •   Past President QAA 2016- 2017


The Scope of Works:
To assess the 2 trees and define a tree protection model prior to the driveway
construction.


Definition
TPZ Tree Protection Zone
SRZ Structural Root Zone
DBH Dimension and Breast Height


Arboricultural Assessment




                                                                                      --
                                                                          APPROVED PLANS
                                                                             OPW21/0187
                                                                           NOOSA COUNCIL
                                                                            20 JULY 2021
                                                                                      -

Page 5

Tree 1
Botanical Name: Delonix regia
Common Name: Poinciana
DBH: 0.254
TPZ: 3.05m radius
SRZ: 2.36m radius
Height: 8m plus
Canopy Spread: 7m approx.


Tree 2
Botanical Name: Delonix regia
Common Name: Poinciana
DBH: 0.42
TPZ: 5.05m radius
SRZ: 2.21m radius
Height: 8m plus
Canopy Spread: 7m approx.




                                      --
                                APPROVED PLANS
                                   OPW21/0187
                                 NOOSA COUNCIL
                                  20 JULY 2021
                                      -

Page 6

Observations
The 2 trees identified both present as stunted specimens and have signs of what we
can assume is vehicle impact. Both observations are typical for this species growing in
a streetscape setting with all the restrictions of this growing position.
There is approximately 7.6 m from centre of trunk to centre of trunk and once the SRZ
is deducted we are left with a 3.2 m space for the driveway. Also considering that 10%
incursion into the SRZ is acceptable we could assume this could be pushed out to
3.6m approximately for the driveway. There are some conditions as identified in the
tree protection methodology that would need to be adhered to for this to be
compliant with AS 4970-2009



Tree Protection Methodology


After defining the TPZ and SRZ we can see that a tree protection


   1. Appoint Australian Tree Contractors & Arboricultural Consultants as Project
       Arborist (PA) Level 5 Arborist for the duration of the project.
   2. All tree protection guidelines to be as AS4970-2009.
   3. PA to set up tree protection fencing defining the TPZ.




   4. All fencing to have signage installed
   5. All contractors to be inducted by PA to the site and to sign onto the conditions
       of the Tree Protection Guidelines set out here.
   6. All demolition or construction works required within the SRZ or TPZ will need
       to be discussed and planned with the PA and the appropriate Tree Protection
       protocols be designed for each instance and reported and ensure they are
       within keeping with AS 4970-2009
   7. All works within the TPZ to be supervised by the PA.
   8. All excavation works within the TPZ to be done with a vacuum excavation. And
       root pruning to be done by level 5 Arborist and supervised by the PA.

                                                                                          --
                                                                            APPROVED PLANS
                                                                               OPW21/0187
                                                                             NOOSA COUNCIL
                                                                              20 JULY 2021
                                                                                          -

Page 7

   9. Any conflicts in construction, design and Tree Protection to be discussed with
       the PA and all conflicts to be mitigated prior to works to stay compliant with
       AS4970-2009 and AS4373-2007




Kind regards
Kurt Brown DIP Arb SCIT, ISA TRAQ Certified, Cert 3 Arb.
Professional Membership QAA, AA, ISA
M: 0431586371 W: www.australianconsultarborist.com.au




                                                                                        --
                                                                            APPROVED PLANS
                                                                               OPW21/0187
                                                                             NOOSA COUNCIL
                                                                              20 JULY 2021
                                                                                        -

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.