Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
3 -
TE]
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST Foch . €
~_
paragraph (a}—
the relevant ,
planning :
scheme
standard, to the
extent it is more
stringent than
the standard
mentioned — in
paragraph (a):
(d) any other
relevant
planning
scheme
standard that is
O not ;
inconsistent
with the . ”
standards we
mentioned in . a
paragraphs ‘
(a), (b) and (c).
$07.1 Excavation and filling | PS7.1 The earthwork and | PS7.1 Strand Gardens oes
for prescribed tidal filling for the submits no excavation a,
work— prescribed tidal work or filling is involved ve
. is consistent with orate
(a) or carried ne each relevant , of
extent o © planning scheme Sos
reasonably standard ny
necessary for a
the work; and te
(b) does not have a :
OQ significant
adverse effect
on-
(i) the natural
features of
the tidal y
water under, .
¢ within or an
over which oe
Meet the work is awe
os located: or
i (ii) the level of
the surface
of the land
under the
tidal water
: under, within
co or over &
7 . which _ the “
. Thy
/ at : oo . . soe age . a
a ‘emanate me Response to Information Request. -- 3 oo vt
Lote, LEGAL , Mg i ne,
: tea ¢ etm PF ae oy We
ek ~ ee , Pee mo,See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.