Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
a
r
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST Fac ’
|
than the ‘
standard om
mentioned = in
paragraph (a)
or (b).
$016.3 Prescribed tidal work | PS16.3. The design and|PS16.3 Strand Garden submits
that is a jetty or a pier constuction of the the prescribed _ tidal
is designed and jetty or pier is work has been
constructed in a way consistent with the designed and certified
to ensure it remains following by an appropriately
above water at all standards— qualified engineer so
times. . that the jetty is above
(a) subject h to the water on highest
@ (b), either. astronomical tide.
(i) the level of
the deck of .
a jetty or ‘
pier is at
least
300mm
above the
water at
highest
astronomic
al tide; or
(ii) piles or
other 4
markers
indicate the .
presence of cos
the jetty or ‘
pier when it 4
© is ”
inundated; -
(b) if a relevant
planning
scheme
standard is
more stringent '
_ than the
standard m
: mentioned — in
paragraph
(a}the
relevant
planning
scheme
standard, to
the extent it is
more stringent ;
than the :
. 4
”
; ° © . Page 41 .
emanate Response to Information Request a
LEGAL . ‘ : co
_ ‘hodSee the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.