Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
‘tt 4,
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST Fah .
:
behind the
retaining wall, ;
revetment or
seawall:
(b) if a relevant
planning
scheme
standard is
more stringent
than the
standard
mentioned — in
paragraph
(a}tthe
relevant
planning
@ scheme
standard, to
the extent it is OO
more stringent ce)
than the A!
standard
mentioned in
paragraph (a).
$020.1 ‘Prescribed tidal work | PS20.1 = (s 6(2) solution) PS20.1 = Strand Gardens
that is a wharf is . submits the prescribed
designed and ine nan on of ane tidal works is not for a
constructed in a way wharf is consistent wharf, therefore ee
to ensure it is able to with the followin $020.1 is not | we
support its intended standards— 9 applicable. er
loads, having regard so
to its relevant (a) subject to Se
loading matters. paragraph (c), *
@ a major wharf, &
or a minor
wharf
accessible to
vehicular ’
traffic, is able
to support at
least the
foliowing- -
(i) a distributed §
live load of
5.OkPa; hs
(ii) a \
concentrate z
d live toad of ,
131(101; 7
(b) subject to
paragraph (c),
© -. Page 54 Ce
emanate ; Response to Information Request . arSee the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.