Original source · versioned page text
Arborist Report
3.1 Proposed site works include the reconstruction of the existing water main which is between 1.5-
1.8m off the road verge. This upgrade, required by Unitywater, will be well within the tree
protection zones (TPZ) of the trees and will significantly compromise tree condition.
An area of approximately 5 to 6 metres would be the calculated TPZ of each tree meaning this
entire area would need to be impact free. This won’t be possible as the existing water main is
well within this protected/sensitive area.
3.2 Proposed earthworks and other site works will also compromise tree condition but in short all
four trees will be severely affected and it is not viable to retain the existing “Poinciana’s”.
A strategy to replace them with advanced healthy trees after the development is recommended.
4. RECOMMENDATIONS
4.0 The centre of Tree 1, at the western end of the site frontage, is just 0.6m off the existing water
main. Given the proximity of the main, retention of this tree is not practical given the need to
reconstruct the main.
4.1 Tree 2 needs to be removed to make way for one of the approved driveways to the site.
4.2 Tree 3 is in poor condition and should be removed.
4.3 The water main is 900mm off the centre of Tree 4. Given the proximity of the main retention
would not be practical given the need to reconstruct the main.
Page 4 of 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (Arborist Report.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.