Council archive · source document
08/0176 - Accommodation Building and Multiple Dwelling (109 units) to be assessed against the Superseded Planning Scheme [As Published] · 132008.176
‘ INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 ‘STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD 2.4.1 Is any part of the premises within 100m of a State-controlled road, or part of a future State-controlled road? LJ Yes No IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007 wed If no, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified threshold? (1 Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency. [x] No IP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3, items 1(a) and 3 ACID SULFATE SOILS 2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local government area listed? in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils? 1 No Yes a 2 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumeit, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas, Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday If yes, is the natural ground level of any part of the premises less than 20m AHD? [ No Yes If yes, will the proposed use involve the following? e Excavating more than 1,000m of soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD «Filling the premises with 1,000m? or more of material with an average depth of 0.5m on land, soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD 00 No (J No [x] Yes 0 Yes if yes to either or both - this application must be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as Advice Agency. IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, tem 4 State Planning Poticy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils, section 3.6 ‘COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 2.1.3 Does the proposed use involve the following? * Carrying out operational work, completely or partly in a coastal management district x] No (Yes © Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatis the [%] No CO Yes construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m? © Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, that is the }] No Yes enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m? if yes fo any one - this application must be referred to EPA as Concurrence Agency. IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 6 (VEGETATION CLEARING j 2.1.4 Do the premises include a lot containing the following? © Accategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) [x] No OD Yes «= If there is no PMAV for a fot, remnant vegetation x] No DD Yes JP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 11 ‘CONTAMINATED LAND - UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE 2.1.5 Isany part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance? (1 Yes - (Complete Part N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence Agency. [x] No IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 12 _
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/0176 - Accommodation Building and Multiple Dwelling (109 units) to be assessed against the Superseded Planning Scheme [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.8 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.