Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

Planning Report 60669

Attached to the e-mail Reconfiguration of a Lot (1 Lot into 4 Lots) - RAL17/0504.

of 68

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Performance outcomes                                Acceptable outcomes                    Response
Note: The monetary value of buildings or
infrastructure should be more than the cost of
associated erosion control structures.
PO10 Erosion control structures minimise            No acceptable outcome is prescribed.   Not applicable.
interference with coastal processes, or any
increase to the severity of erosion on adjacent                                            The development does not comprise coastal
land by:                                                                                   protection work.
1. locating the erosion control structure as far
    landward as practicable and directly adjacent
    to the structure it is intended to protect
2. where required and feasible, importing sand
    to the site to mitigate any increase in the
    severity of erosion
3. the design of the structure.
Water quality
PO11 Development:                                   No acceptable outcome is prescribed.   Complies.
1. maintains or enhances environmental values
    of receiving waters
2. achieves the water quality objectives of                                                The proposed development will not negatively
    Queensland waters                                                                      impact on water quality. Please refer to the
3. avoids the release of prescribed water                                                  comments made on water quality by Tod
    contaminants to tidal waters.                                                          Consulting Pty Ltd within the Engineering Report
                                                                                           (Appendix D).
Note: See Environmental Protection (Water) Policy
2009 for the relevant water quality objectives.                                            It is acknowledged that a report will be required
                                                                                           to address the issue of potential acid sulfate soils
                                                                                           due to the low-lying nature of the subject site.
                                                                                           This report will be provided during the
                                                                                           Information & Referral Stage of the development
                                                                                           application process.
Category C and R areas of vegetation
PO12 Development:                                   No acceptable outcome is prescribed.   Not applicable.
1. avoids impacts on category C areas of

State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works                                                                        Page 4 of 8
Log in to download the original file

Planning Report 60669.pdf · 2.3 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.