Council archive · source document
Appendix F- Economic Impact Assessment · MCU23/0078
Very large file (11.7 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
37
Table 8—Analysis Year Reference 2022 2027 2030 2035
of traditional retail Catchment area population - persons A 95,334 100,210 102,185 104,815
floorspace provision
Demand for traditional retail floorspace
and need
Average retail demand (@ 1.6 sqm/cap) - sqm B = A x 1.6 152,500 160,300 163,500 167,700
Source: Deep End Existing traditional retail floorspace provision
Services Existing supply - sqm C (Table 7) 114,150 114,150 114,150 114,150
Floorspace supported by visitors - sqm D = C x 25% 85,600 85,600 85,600 85,600
Existing supply supported by catchment - sqm E=C-D 28,550 28,550 28,550 28,550
Retail floorspace not retained locally - sqm F=B-E 66,900 74,700 77,900 82,100
Retention rate - % G = (B - F) / B 56% 53% 52% 51%
Need analysis to reflect ShapingSEQ designation
Floorspace supported by catchment - sqm H = B x 70% 106,800 112,200 114,500 117,400
Floorspace demand by visitors - sqm I = 2.5% pa 28,550 32,400 34,900 39,600
Total supportable provision - sqm J=H+I 135,350 144,600 149,400 157,000
Floorspace provision balance (undersupply) - sqm K=J-C -21,200 -30,450 -35,250 -42,850
Supermarket floorspace provision analysis
A similar provision rate approach can be used to examine the need for additional
supermarket floorspace to serve the catchment population and visitors to the catchment
and is presented in Table 9.
In this instance, the demand for supermarket floorspace generated by the residential
population is compared against current supermarket floorspace provision within the
catchment after allowing for incoming demand from tourists and other visitors.
As highlighted in Section 5.3, the visitor contribution to grocery shopping demand is
estimated at 14%; however, to be conservative a figure of 10% is adopted in this analysis,
to reflect the likely direction of a larger share of grocery shopping to smaller food
retailers rather than supermarkets.
The analysis presented in Table 9 demonstrates that a total of 30,950 sqm of
supermarket floorspace is located within the catchment, of which an estimated
27,900 sqm is supported by catchment residents (ie 90%).
When compared against the catchment population, this indicates a current supermarket
floorspace provision rate of 0.293 sqm/cap, which is:
• 19% below the average provision of 0.362 sqm/cap across the Sunshine Coast;
• 26% below the average of 0.394 sqm/cap in Queensland; and
• 28% below the average of 0.405 sqm/cap for non-metropolitan Queensland.
On any of these comparisons the catchment is clearly under-supplied with supermarket
floorspace, and with ongoing population growth the average provision rate will continue
to decline, reaching as low as 0.266 sqm/cap by 2035 if no new supermarket floorspace
is built.
The extent of undersupply of supermarket floorspace has been modelled in Table 9 by
comparing existing provision against the supermarket demand if the Queensland average
provision rate of 0.394 sqm per capita is applied to the catchment population.
These calculations show that there is an existing under-provision of 9,600 sqm of
supermarket floorspace serving the catchment, with the under-provision widening to
11,500 sqm by 2026 and reaching 13,500 sqm by 2035.
Noosa Village Mixed Use Development – Economic Impact Statement for Development Application Deep End Services
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix F- Economic Impact Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 11.7 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.