Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU14-0106 Submission

Attached to the e-mail MCU14/0106 Submission PM Support - Grant Holloway.

of 2

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

It is relevant to note that this principle is consistent with Activity Centre based planning policies, national
competition policy and the precedent set in the famous KFC v Ganditis (1979) High Court case.

In KFC v Ganditis the High Court ruled that the threat of competition to existing business, if not accompanied
by a prospect of a resultant overall adverse effect upon the extent and adequacy of facilities available to a
local community will not be a relevant town planning consideration.

Clearly while growth in a market is also important in determining changes in the adequacy of facilities over
time, it is also essential to understand whether latent, unsatisfied demand exists and whether there are gaps in
the market that can be filled without reliance on growth.”




                                                                                                            Page 2 of 2
Log in to download the original file

MCU14-0106 Submission.pdf · 109 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.