Council archive · source document
Water Quality Monitoring Report - Noosa Civic - November 2009-2010 - Eenie Creek Rd NOOSAVILLE · 132002.220285
Very large file (34.4 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Page 2of8
Work Oroler EB1000755
Client DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL
Project DE0923
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may he due to primary sample extractldigestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the OC process lot
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
RPD = Relative Percentage Difference
# = Indicates failed OC
M
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Water Quality Monitoring Report - Noosa Civic - November 2009-2010 - Eenie Creek Rd NOOSAVILLERelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 34.4 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.