Council archive · source document
Response to Information Request - Received on 19/04/2012 · OPW11/0335
Very large file (89.8 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 43, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Roof Restaurant
0.111
100
400
10
200
50
50
25
5
o
1,0.34
2.18,0.39
-0.97,0.31
-0.47,0.31
0.2,0.2
0.26,0.23
~
Table B 3 Stage 1 MUSIC M odeIInputP8rsmeters- TreatmentoeVlces (A)
-
Treatment devices and parameters Rain tank Restaurant
Low flow by-pass (m3/sec) 0
-
’\ .
High flow by-pass (m3/sec) \.. ~ ’\ \ 100
Volume below overflow pipe (kL) ’’{’" ~\ ,
_< ’l 100
, I ,
Depth above overflow (m) 0.2
, ,
Surface area (m2) j "r 5
-
Overflow pipe diameter (mm) / 150
,
Anunal demand 9kUyr)scaled by daily PET -"""-""",.~".. -’ 0
Daily demand (kUday) 7.633
Monthly distribution of annual demand (kUyr) 0
Table B-4: Stage 1 MUSIC Model Input Parameters Treatment Devices (B)
-
Blo-retentlon Blo-retentlon
Treatment devices and parameters
C1A C1B
Low flow by-pass (m3/sec) 0 0
High flow by-pass (m3/sec) 100 100
Surface area (m2) 52 37
Extended detention depth (m) 0.2 0.2
Seepage loss (mm/hr) 0 0
Filter area (m2) 63 74
Filter depth (m) 0.5 0.5
Filter median particle diameter (mm) 0.45 0.45
Saturated hydraulic conductivity (mm/hr) 150 150
Depth below underdrain pipe (%of filter depth) 0 0
Overflow weir width (m) 3 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Response to Information Request - Received on 19/04/2012Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 89.8 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.