Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

planning report 45 Maple St -v1-2023

of 19

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

 Plot ratio       Individual buildings no      0.5:1                          0.376:1 (936m2)           Y
                  more than 1000m² each
 Private  Open                                 Small dwellings – 20m²/9m²     >20m2 / 9m²               Y
 Space
 Setbacks         Frontage – 6m                Type A building – 6m           Type A building –         PO / Y
                  Side – 3m                    frontage & 1.5m side           6m frontage and
                                               boundary                       1.5m & 4m side
                                                                              boundary
                                               Type B Building                Type B – 1.5m side        PO / Y
                                               Type C & D building            boundary


                                                                              Type C & D                PO / Y
                                                                              building  –    6m
                                                                              frontage      and
                                                                              1.87m / 2m sides
 Wall length      <30m                         <15m                           <9m                       Y
 Garages                                       Garage doors facing the        No garages facing         Y
                                               street are separated by 2m     the street
                                               or staggered
 Roof Form                                     Width of parapet wall <50%     No Parapets               Y
                                               of front
 Landscaping      15% of site area (374m²)     Front 6m landscaping with
                  2m landscaped garden to      pools and visitor carparking
                  frontage                     setback 2m

                                               35% (874m2) landscaping        894m²(36%)                Y
                                               with 60% (349m2) of this to    680m² (77% soft)          Y
                                               be soft landscaping




 Carparking and                                1 space for 1 and 2 bedroom    14         spaces         Y
 access                                        small dwelling and 1 space     provided plus 1
                                               per 4 dwellings visitor        SRV loading
                                               11 spaces plus
                                               3 visitor = 14 total
 Earthworks       Cut or fill less than 1.5m                                  1.6m fill                 PO
 Fencing                                       Setback an avg of 1m and       All   fencing      will   Y
                                               articulated by stepping the    comply with       this
                                               design.                        provision.



4.5.1 Setbacks
While the setbacks are commensurate with that required for a multiple dwelling in the MDR, the side
setbacks do not meet the Acceptable Outcome of 3m for a side setback within the Community
Facilities zone.


PO10 of the CF and PO12 of the MDR generally reflect the same provisions requiring that building
setbacks do not unreasonably obstruct views, cause overlooking, preserve existing and allow for
new vegetation and be consistent with the predominant character in the surrounding area.


The proposal complies with the PO10 of the CF and PO12 of the MDR for the following reasons:
 •    The proposal provides good separation between land uses with all side boundaries providing
      a minimum of a 1m wide garden which allows sufficient space for vegetation to mature;
 •    2 of the buildings are single storey and therefore with no upper level, no overlooking can occur;
 •    Given 2 of the 3 buildings are single storey, no additional shading will occur when compared
      to that of a 2 storey building setback 3m;
 •    Types C & D building, while 2 storeys, bedrooms are located to the south side and high level
      windows to the north side;

                                                                                                        Page 15 of 19

Log in to download the original (planning report 45 Maple St -v1-2023.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.