Council archive · source document
Attachment 1 - Preliminary Town Planning Advice · MCU15/0122
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0122 - PM Submission Object - Noosaville Medical Centre.
Court Appeals & Dispute Resolution
Applications & Assessment
Due Diligence & Compliance
Project Management
General Development Advice
Preliminary Town Planning Advice
Date: Monday, 18 July 2016
To: Norm Oliver, Director
From: Shane Adamson, Town Planning Specialist
Client: Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre Pty Ltd
Project: Development Application For Material Change Of Use For a Medical
Centre at 52-58 Goodchap Street & 3-7 Val Crescent, Noosaville
Subject: Preliminary Assessment of Proposed Medical Centre
Introduction
1. The purpose of this memo is to be provide advice about the proposed medical
centre, to be located at 52-58 Goodchap Street & 3-7 Val Crescent, Noosaville,
described as Lots 6-9 on RP138011 and Lots 13 & 14 on RP15141. The subject land
is located on the corner of Goodchap Street and Val Crescent, directly opposite the
Noosa Hospital in Goodchap Street (refer Figure 1).
Figure 1 – Aerial Photograph
2. The proposed development seeks a development permit for material change of use
of premises for a Commercial Business Type 2 – Medical and Retail Business Type 2
Adamson Town Planning Pty Ltd ATF
(ACN: 163 798 374 | ABN: 72 472 058 207)
P (07) 5430 6671 F (07) 5430 6677 M 0437 754 420 Mail: PO Box 78, Peregian Beach QLD 4573
‘Noosa Boardroom’, 28 Eenie Creek Road, Nooosaville QLD 4566
Email| [email protected] Web| www.adamsontownplanning.com.au
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 9 pages
Page 2
- Shop & Saloon over the subject land, generally in accordance with the proposal
plans provided by Blackburne Jackson Design.
3. The proposed medical centre has a gross floor area of about 2,470m², which is to
be provided over two levels. According to the town planning report, a total of 125
on-site car parking spaces are to be provided, the majority of which are included in
a basement (97 spaces), with some parking to be provided at grade (28) near
Goodchap Street; however in response to the information request made, 31 spaces
are now proposed at grade near the Goodchap Street frontage.
4. Access to the development is proposed off Goodchap Street with both the entry
and exist being left in and left out. According to the proposal plans, the proposed
building is about 8m in height from the natural ground level, over a basement
carpark.
5. It is intended that about 1,000m² of the floor space will be used by Noosa
Radiology, which currently occupies about 744m² of floor space in the nearby
Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre (Centre), located on the corner of
Goodchap Street and Eumundi-Noosa Road. The remaining floor space is to be
provided for specialist medical practices and also includes a small café, to be used
primarily by on-site patients and employees.
6. The proposed development is located in an established residential area located
directly opposite the Noosa Hospital, which is comprised primarily of detached
housing. The proposed development primarily fronts Goodchap Street; however
also fronts Val Crescent, which is a residential cul-de-sac.
7. From the proposal plans, it appears that the proposed development is 2 storeys in
height with a basement carpark also being provided. The proposed development
primarily fronts Goodchap Street and has reduced building setbacks to Val
Crescent. Some landscaping is proposed to be provided to the frontages.
Noosa Plan 2006
8. Under the Noosa Plan 2006 (planning scheme) the subject land is located in the
Detached Housing Zone. According to the Table of Assessment for the Detached
Housing Zone, both Commercial Business Type 2 – Medical and Retail Business Type
2 - Shop & Salon are inconsistent uses and are subject to impact assessment.
Consequently an assessment is required against the whole of the planning scheme.
Desired Environmental Outcomes
2|Page
Page 3
9. A number of desired environmental outcomes are provided under Part 3 of the
planning scheme. The most relevant desired environmental outcomes are discussed
below.
b) COMMERCIAL & RETAIL USES
A hierarchy of centres with a range of Commercial and Retail business uses provide
suitable levels of amenity, service and access to the community, consistent with the
community’s location and needs and is based on:
i. …;
ii. the Shire Business Centre, a Major Activity Centre for the purposes of the SEQ
Regional Plan and the highest order centre within the former Noosa Shire,
developed in stages consistent with the needs of the population of the former
Noosa Shire and areas to the immediate south;
iii. protecting the long term viability of the Shire Business Centre as the principle
business, retail and administrative centre;
iv. recognising that it may be necessary to increase floor space in existing centres
to meet changing needs, provided any increased floor space does not impact
on the successful operation and development of the Shire Business Centre;
v. business centres at Cooroy, Noosa Junction, Noosaville and Tewantin;
vi. neighbourhood or visitor centres at Peregian Beach, Sunrise Beach,
vii. Sunshine Beach, Noosa Heads, Noosaville, Tewantin, Cooroibah and Teewah;
viii. …
10. The proposed development is for commercial and retail business having a
significant scale, with a gross floor area of about 2,470m². The proposed medical
centre is to be located on residential land and is not located in the Shire Business
Centre (Noosa Business Centre) or another business centre identified above.
11. The proposed development is of a scale that is likely to have an adverse impact
upon the long term viability of the Noosa Business Centre (NBC), which is to be
developed as the principle business centre in stages, in response to the needs of
the local community. Consequently, the proposed development compromises the
achievement of this desired environmental outcome.
i) RESIDENTIAL USES
Urban and rural settlement for residential use is developed to be consistent with:
i the planned capacity for roads, community services and infrastructure for the
particular locality;
ii the expectations of Noosa’s population to have access to a broad range of safe,
secure and affordable housing;
3|Page
Page 4
iii the expected character and amenity for the particular locality;
iv the landform, natural environmental and climatic conditions of the locality;
v energy efficiency and water conserving design principles;
vi convenience and accessibility to urban services; and
vii suitable separation from incompatible land uses. (emphasis added)
12. The proposed development is for a large continuous commercial building to be
located over a number of residential properties, included in the Detached Housing
Zone. Consequently, the proposed development is not in keeping with the expected
character and amenity for the particular locality and therefore compromises the
achievement of the above desired environmental outcome.
Noosaville Locality Code
13. The overall outcomes are the purpose of the Noosaville Locality Code. The most
relevant overall outcomes sought for the Noosaville Locality include the following:
1. New uses and works are located, designed and managed to:
i. be compatible with other uses and works;
ii. maintain the safety of people and works;
iii. avoid significant adverse impacts on the amenity enjoyed by users of other
premises, including acoustic and visual qualities; and
iv. avoid significant adverse effects on the natural environment, including
native habitat removal, fragmentation and attrition;
14. The proposed development has not been located and designed to be compatible
with the surrounding residential uses and is likely to have a significant adverse
impact upon the amenity enjoyed by users of other premises, from both an acoustic
and visual amenity perspective. Consequently, the proposed development conflicts
with overall outcome a) above.
q) For the Detached Housing Zone - single detached housing prevails which
maintains:
v. low rise, low density development form;
vi. a high level of residential amenity consistent with the varied character of
the locality’s residential neighbourhoods;
vii. allotment sizes and densities which are consistent with the character of the
particular neighbourhood;
viii. building styles befitting the character of the locality and the regional
climate, and which respond to, and are integrated with, natural site
characteristics including native vegetation;
4|Page
Page 5
ix. various styles and eras depicting a cross section of architectural
development and the history of Noosaville; and
x. landscaping amongst buildings, retaining trees and vegetation wherever
practical;
15. The proposed development is not for single detached housing and is for a large
scale commercial development over a number of existing residential allotments.
The development does not maintain a low rise, low density development form or a
high level of residential amenity consistent with the varied character of the locality.
16. The proposed development will ultimately result in the amalgamation of a number
residential allotments to provide for the large scale development, which is not
consistent with the character of the locality. Therefore the proposed development
conflict’s with overall outcome q) above.
Specific Outcomes
17. The specific outcomes for the Noosaville Locality are provided under Table 11.13,
with the most relevant specific outcomes being discussed below.
18. The proposed development has not been located and designed to avoid significant
adverse changes to noise and accessibility and other conditions enjoyed by
adjoining and nearby uses and therefore is conflict with specific outcome O1.
19. The proposed development does not have a visual bulk and an architectural scale
consistent with structures on adjoining land, will visually dominate the street and
does not preserve the amenity of surrounding land. Consequently, the proposed
development is in conflict with specific outcome O8.
20. The proposed development has not been appropriately designed and sited to
provide amenity for users of adjoining premises and does not maintain the visual
continuity and pattern of buildings within either Val Crescent or Goodchap Street.
Consequently, the proposed development is in conflict with specific outcome O9.
21. The proposed development results is a building that is not of a scale compatible
with surrounding development, has a bulky appearance to adjacent properties and
the streetscape and therefore is in conflict with specific outcome O10.
22. The proposed development is for a commercial business use and retail business use
not listed under specific outcome 028 and therefore is not to be located in the
Detached Housing Zone. The proposed development is for uses listed under
specific outcome O29 and therefore is for uses that are listed as being inconsistent
5|Page
Page 6
and are not to be located in Detached House Zone. Consequently, the proposed
development is in conflict with specific outcomes O28 and O29.
23. The proposed built form is not of a scale and nature that is complementary and
respectful to its surroundings, does not contribute positively to the existing
streetscape character and will visually dominate the streetscape. Consequently, the
proposed development is in conflict with specific outcome O31.
24. The proposed development does not give the physical appearance of being one
Detached House on a single allotment and therefore in conflict with specific
outcome O33.
25. In summary, the proposed development is in conflict with a number of overall and
specific outcomes under the Noosaville Locality Code.
Key Planning Considerations
Impact upon the NBC and other developments
26. The planning scheme provides that the Noosa Business Centre (NBC) be the highest
order centre within the Noosa area, which is to be developed in stages consistent
with the needs of the local community. Further, a key planning strategy is to protect
the long term viability of the NBC as the principle business, retail and administrative
centre.
27. It is acknowledged in the provisions that it may be necessary to increase floor space
in existing centres to meet changing needs, provided any increased floor space
does not adversely impact on the successful operation and development of the
NBC. Put plainly, the planning scheme specifically provides that commercial and
retail development that is not consistent with the planning scheme should not be
allowed, as it is likely to undermine the further development of the NBC. The
proposed commercial development is of a scale that will seriously undermine this
intent.
28. Under the current and former planning schemes, it has always been intended that
medical uses that provide support and specialist services to the Noosa Hospital be
located on land on the corner of Goodchap Street and Eumundi Noosa Road. This
land has been developed for the Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre, which
contains a mix of uses, including Commercial Business Type 2 Medical. This land
has always been intended to provide support and specialist services to the Noosa
Hospital and these support services are currently operating from the site, including
Noosa Radiology.
6|Page
Page 7
29. This position is supported by a number of specific provisions for the Community
Services Zone under the Noosaville Locality Code, which provide that a small
medical precinct be established on land, formally described as Lot 1 on RP900855,
which is where the Centre is located. These provisions include specific outcomes
O170, O171 and O173, and in particular probable solution S173.1, which state that
a medical precinct be established on this land.
30. Consequently, the proposed development is also in conflict with these provisions,
given that the planning scheme specifically seeks that support services for the
Noosa Hospital be located on this land and not land included in the Detached
Housing Zone, regardless of whether it is in close proximity to the Noosa Hospital.
Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre
31. The Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre has been successful and is well
tenanted; however, currently there is about 350m² of available floor space in the
Centre. Further, while there are a range of uses allowed within the Centre, including
education for the University of Central Queensland (UCQ) this does not mean that
these uses will remain at this location in the long term, in particular if the NBC
develops as expected.
32. It is specifically intended under the planning scheme that uses such as the UCQ be
located in the NBC. Should this occur, there will be considerable floor space (about
3,000m²) available in the Centre that could accommodate a range of medical uses
that provide support to the Noosa Hospital. The existing Centre is well located for
this purpose.
33. Noosa Radiology is currently a tenant in the Centre. The owner of the Centre has
confirmed that at no time has Noosa Radiology made a request for additional floor
space to be provided. Given the nature of the Centre, being a mixed use
development, the type and number of tenancies regularly changes. Consequently,
it is highly likely that had Noosa Radiology approached the owner about acquiring
more floor space, this could have been accommodated, with sufficient contiguous
floor space able to be provided.
34. It should also be noted that there is potential to provide additional floor space at
the Centre, being in the order of about 720m², subject to sufficient parking being
provided and some other issues being resolved.
35. In summary, the proposed development is in significant conflict with the Noosa
Plan 2006.
7|Page
Page 8
Need
36. The applicant has acknowledged in the application material that there is some
conflict with the Noosa Plan. Further, the applicant has tried to justify the proposed
development based on its location being close to Noosa Hospital and because
there is purportedly a significant need for additional floor space to be made
available to provide support services for the Noosa Hospital.
37. With respect to the matter of need the applicant has provided an Economic Needs
Analysis undertaken by Urban Economics, which has been reviewed by Foresight
Partners Pty Ltd, provided as Attachment 2. The review concludes the following:
We conclude that there is not a need for the proposed medical centre, for the following
reasons:
1. The identified need for the proposal is based in part on an assessment one year
ago (in July, 2015), which found that there was insufficient floorspace in the
existing Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre to accommodate a 300m
expansion of Noosa Radiology. Since that assessment was conducted,
sufficient additional floorspace has become available in the existing centre to
accommodate the expansion of Noosa Radiology.
2. Other than Noosa Radiology, the Economic Needs Analysis by Urban
Economics has not identified any specific medical practitioners that are
seeking additional floorspace in the vicinity of Noosa Hospital.
3. While over the next 15 years there will modest growth in demand for medical
services in the trade area generally, there is no demonstrated need for
additional GP and specialist medical services in the vicinity of Noosa Hospital,
which already hosts a variety of specialist medical services.
38. Consequently, it is not agreed that there is a level of need for the proposed
development that would be sufficient to overcome the significant level of conflict
identified with the planning scheme.
Location
39. The issue of the proposed development being in close proximity to the Noosa
Hospital has been raised as a potential ground for allowing the development. While
it appears on face value that the location of the proposed medical centre is ideal to
service the needs of patrons of the hospital, this is not agreed with.
8|Page
Page 9
40. While there is potentially some synergy could occur between the proposed medical
centre and the Noosa Hospital at this location, the benefit is marginal at best, in my
opinion. This is because:
• the Centre is located less than 1 km from Noosa Hospital;
• it is highly unlikely that a patient would attend the Noosa Hospital and the
proposed medical centre in the same day, with an appointment generally being
required before attending most specialist medical services;
• the use of the proposed specialist medical services will serve the general public
who may or may not be attending the Noosa Hospital, having been previously
referred by a general practitioner or other specialist;
• while the proposed medical centre is within walking distance to the Noosa
Hospital, it is highly unlikely that an unwell person would simply walk across the
road to attend the proposed medical centre, which is not desirable in any event
at this location, given Goodchap Street is a major collector road;
• assuming that most clients will drive to the proposed medical centre, the
majority of clients would pass the existing Centre in any event;
• the applicant is suggesting that patrons attending the Centre from the north will
undertake a U-turn in Juron Street, which should not be encouraged;
• given access to the proposed development is to be left in and left out only,
persons leaving the Noosa Hospital would most likely turnaround at the
roundabout at in Eumundi-Noosa Road and would subsequently pass the
Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre, making the trip no more convenient
or assessable; and
• there is no ability for any overflow parking for the proposed development at this
location given the number of cars regularly parked in Goodchap Street by
patrons and staff attending the Noosa Hospital, with the peak periods for both
developments likely to coincide.
41. Consequently, given the above, it is not agreed that the location of the proposed
medical centre offers any real advantage compared to that offered by the
Noosaville Medical and Professional Centre, where the proposed uses are to be
located in accordance with the planning scheme.
Conclusion
42. The proposed development is for a purpose built medical centre of significant scale,
being about 2,470m² of floor area provided over two levels. The proposed
development is to be located in a residential area, primarily comprised of detached
dwellings on single allotments, directly opposite the Noosa Hospital in Goodchap
Street.
9|Page
Page 10
43. The proposed development is to be located in the Detached Housing Zone, with
the proposed commercial business and retail business uses being inconsistent uses
in this zone. Further, the proposed development is in conflict with a number of
overall and specific outcomes of the Noosaville Locality Code. Further, the proposed
development compromises the achievement of some of the desired environmental
outcomes under the planning scheme.
44. A key strategy under the Noosa Plan is to protect the long term viability of the NBC
as the principle business, retail and administrative centre for the Noosa area. It is
acknowledged that it may be necessary to increase floor space in existing centres
to meet changing needs, provided any increased floor space does not adversely
impact on the successful operation and development of the NBC; however, the
proposed development is not located in an existing centre and is in a residential
area and zone. Put plainly, the planning scheme specifically provides that
commercial and retail development that is not consistent with the planning scheme
should not be allowed as it is likely to undermine the further development of the
NBC. The proposed development is of a scale and intensity that seriously
undermines this intent.
45. Having regard to the advice provided by Foresight Partners, there is not a significant
need for the proposed medical centre. Having regard to the comments made above
about the location of the proposed development, there is little community benefit
if any in locating the proposed development opposite Noosa Hospital. Given that
there is not a significant need for the proposed medical centre and the proposed
location provides marginal if any community benefit, there is subsequently no
planning need for the proposed medical centre.
46. The proposed development is in significant conflict with the planning scheme and
there are not grounds that are sufficient to overcome this conflict. Consequently,
the proposed development should be refused.
Shane Adamson (BEngTech, GDURP, MPIA)
Town Planning Specialist
Director of Adamson Town Planning Pty Ltd ATF
10 | P a g e
Used in these records
Attachment 1 - Preliminary Town Planning Advice.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 760 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.