Original source · versioned page text
Reference Document - MCU25 0101 (As Published)
Project No. PG-13872 Page | 7 August 2025 Ref: PG-13872, 2025-08-14, GR VER 1 Stephen & Jane Struss – Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Residence, 28 Kingfisher Drive, Peregian Beach 9.0 TEMPORARY BATTER SUPPORT Where the excavations cannot be battered to a stable angle, they will need to be supported to prevent instability. Support systems could include: Sheet Piles – anchoring or cross-bracing of the excavation are likely to be required for sheet piles or possibly cantilevered, and due consideration should be given to the potential for anchor installation and vibration to adversely affect adjacent areas. Contiguous Piles – whilst no vibration is associated with their installation, it is likely a more expensive solution. Where sheet piles are to installed through medium dense or ‘denser’ sands, pre-drilling may be required to ensure installation. Where sands are retained, shoring pressures should be based on the lateral earth pressure coefficients given in Table 2, in conjunction with a triangular pressure distribution where the pressure can be calculated from P=0.5ka H2, provided the excavation is not surcharged by adjacent buildings/services and some tolerance or movement exists. TABLE 2 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients Unit Weight Material Strength (K) (t/m3) Flexible Propped Very Loose to Loose 1.8 0.40 0.60 Sands Medium Dense 2.0 0.30 0.50 Dense to Very Dense 2.1 0.25 0.45 Pressures for unsurcharged propped walls could be designed based on a uniform pressure distribution with depth, where the pressure P = 0.65ka H (kPa) where H is the depth of the excavation. The shoring wall should also be checked for a triangular distribution calculated using the lateral earth pressure coefficients present in Table 2 for a propped wall. The temporary support system should also take into consideration the possible needs to over-excavate the basement for ground improvement works. It should be noted that lateral deflection of the retention system will occur, irrespective of the retention system adopted. In additional to lateral movements, vertical movement of the soils behind the retention system will result. The effects of the vertical and horizontal movements may be seen at a distance equal to 2 or 3 times the height of the excavation. Subject to detailed design, movements as much as 1% to 2% of the depth of the excavation could occur behind a cantilevered pile wall.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.