Original source · versioned page text
Reference Document - OPW25 0085 (AS Published)
Very large file (18.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Table 4: Details of Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (AGS 2007)
Hazard Likelihood Consequence Assessed Risk Comments
Landslide through Unlikely Minor Low Given the gentle to moderate gradients
future fill and natural across the development areas and
soils above the relatively shallow depth to stiff/medium
foundation depth dense (or stronger) residual soils it is
considered Unlikely that a landslide
would develop, subject to
implementation of the
recommendations in Section 6. Given a
potential Minor impact from such
shallow instability the resultant risk
would be Low as per AGS 2007.
Deep seated failure Rare Major Low The likelihood of a deep failure through
within weathered the weathered sedimentary rock below
sedimentary rock the footing depths is assessed as Rare
below the foundation due to the strength of these materials,
depth moderately sloping ground and no
signs of previous deep-seated
instability. Although the consequence
of such a failure could be Major, the
resultant risk is Low as per AGS 2007.
The potential impacts on slope stability of the development components have been assessed, and the
measures recommended below in Section 6 have been designed to mitigate those impacts, so that a Low
Risk of instability is achieved and can be maintained for the proposed development.
5.2.2 Numerical Modelling
In order to estimate the factor of safety (FOS) against slope instability for the proposed development,
numerical analysis has been conducted using Slope/W, including consideration of adverse short-term
groundwater conditions. The modelled conditions for future construction comprised a 30 kPa surcharge,
to represent filling up to 1.5 m high. As all footings for the future structures on slopes greater than 10°
will be founded into weathered rock, minimal building loads are expected to surcharge the soil profile.
The subsurface profile for this scenario was modelled on the conditions encountered in the test pits
across the likely building areas, comprising stiff (or stiffer) residual clayey silt/silty clay overlying
weathered siltstone. The model assumes any existing topsoil and any firm/loose (or weaker) materials
will be stripped from the development areas prior to filling.
Groundwater was encountered within five of the twelve test pits and the investigation was completed
just after a period of prolonged heavy rainfall at the site. As such, groundwater conditions have been
modelled with a piezometric surface at about 0.5 m BGL to assess the FOS during an adverse temporary
(short-term) case.
Results of the numerical slope stability analysis are illustrated in Text Figure 12 overleaf. The key points
from our analysis are summarised as follows:
Unit weight and shear strength parameters adopted for the soil and weathered rock strata were
estimated based on our interpretation of the geotechnical investigation data and were typically
within the mid range of values recommended for similar materials in Appendix D of Australian
Standard AS4678-2002 Earth Retaining Structures.
Geo-Environmental Investigation for Proposed Subdivision
7 February 2025 | 24386-001-Rev0 14
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.