Information Request Response

1. Information Required
Provide a site plan that accurately shows existing property boundaries with respect to the development.


Response
Please refer to the attached Revised Proposal Plans which have clearly defined and notated all existing and proposed
finished ground levels with respect to building height. RL’s of the proposed highest points are also reflected clearly.


2. Information Required
Provide amended plans of a building that complies with the elements outlined above with regard to the façade to Holts
Rd and Taylor Crt. Provide amended plans that has the façade vary in line and plane, have variance in horizontal and
vertical elements, consider textural elements and avoid a box profile to the street. Please note that setback to the Holt’s
Rd boundary may be necessary as per the neighbouring approved development on Lots 2 & 3.


Response
Please refer to the attached ‘Revised Proposal Plans’, which have stepped the building back .6m in addition to the
already 10m setback from the Holts Rd shared boundary. In doing so have achieved a continuous roof overhang, which
combined with external wall treatments, window screening and panel rebates have enhanced the visual appearance of
the rear of the building facing Holts Rd.


3. Information Required
Provide amended plans that complies with Acceptable outcome AO14 (b) of the Low impact industry zone code and
includes provision for landscaping.


Response
It is important for Council to note the Taylor Court property boundary is tapered whereas the building has adopted a
conventional construction pattern and not relied upon tapered walls which reduce useable internal building spaces. As a
result, a small portion of the raised part of Tenancy 1 (over car parks 4, 5 and part of 6) has a reduced setback of 3.868m
measured to the wall and 3.336m to the roof overhang. We consider the reduced setback for this small part of the
building, in the context of the entire length of the building facing Taylor Court complies with PO14 as follows;
     a)    The amenity of on-site users is not impacted on by the reduce setback for the upper level. The reduced setback
           occurs at a part of the site which faces Taylor Court and is at an upper level which is open at the ground level
           further negating any assumed visual impacts of the reduction