Council archive · source document
Storm Water management plan · MCU12/0133.03
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Noosa Council documents
Bligh Tanner Consulting Engineers Page 7
Noosa Flexi Learning Centre Stormwater Management Plan
August 2012
The most appropriate acceptable solution for this site is to have rainwater tanks, sized at
1500L per required pedestal (Acceptable Solution A3), which is connected to each required
pedestal, external use, and washing machine cold water taps (Acceptable Solution A2).
2.4 Construction Phase Objectives
Stormwater run-off from land development and infrastructure development sites has a high
potential to cause water contamination and/or environmental harm. This is regulated under
the EP Act 1994.
Under S440ZG it is an offence to unlawfully deposit a prescribed water contaminant to
waters. Prescribed contaminants are listed in Schedule 9 of the Environmental Protection
Regulation 2008 (EP Reg), and include: ashes, clay, gravel, sediment, stones and similar
organic or inorganic matter, as well as building and construction materials and waste.
Under S 319 persons in Queensland carrying out activities which may cause environmental
harm must comply with the ’general environmental duty’ (GED). This requires that all
reasonable and practicable measures must be adopted to prevent and minimise
environmental harm. Although not being able to demonstrate compliance against GED is not
an offence, demonstrating that all reasonable and practicable measures have been adopted
is a defence for offences such as water contamination. For instance, under chapter 10,
s493A of the EP Act, where a person deposits a prescribed water contaminant to waters or
causes unlawful environmental harm, it is a defence to demonstrate compliance with the
GED. Demonstrating that all reasonable and practicable measures have been conceived and
implemented should encompass:
• thorough and ongoing site assessments
• consideration of, and adaptation for site specific erosion risk factors including
topography, soil type, climate and season
• design, installation, operation, management, maintenance and monitoring of control
measures as identified in the erosion and sediment control plan.
Erosion Hazard Assessment
This site is considered low risk based on the following erosion hazard assessment:
• Predicted Annual Soil loss (tonnes) = A x B x T
• Where A = R.K.LS.C.P (as per the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation).
Table 4 Values used in erosion hazard estimation
Factor Description Adopted value
R Rainfall erosivity factor 5700 (i 2y 6hr = 15.8 mm/hr)
K Soil erodibility factor 0.04 (loam)
LS Topographic factor 0.2 (100 m @ 1%)
C Cover and management 1 (no cover)
P Practice 1.3 (no management)
B Area of disturbance 0.5 ha
T Predicted duration 0.5 yrs
Predicted unmitigated soil loss = 59 t/ha/yr x 0.5 ha x 0.5 yrs = 15 tonnes
As this is significantly less than 150 tonnes, this development is considered low risk,
and accordingly a minor erosion and sediment control plan will be provided as part of
the operational works application, as per Sunshine Coast Regional Council’s Manual
for Erosion and Sediment Control V1.2 (Nov 2008).
Print Date: 2 March 2020, 2:19 PM
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Storm Water management plan.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.1 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.