Council archive · source document
Information Request MCU23 0078 [As Published] · MCU23/0078
b) Clarify the proposed arrangements for car parking provided for the residential
components of the development. It is currently proposed that residents will need to
compete with other users for car parking spaces, in circumstances where normally
there would be separate secured resident parking areas provided within the carpark.
c) The currently supplied information regarding temporal parking demands for the
different proposed uses in order to support the proposed parking relaxation is
insufficient. At a holiday destination like Noosa, parking demands for each of the
proposed uses can reach co-incident or near co-incident peaks during school holiday
periods. There is no information supplied to be able to determine whether the
parking demand profiles derived from Google analytics as used in the TIA are
representative of design parking conditions at Noosa which will occur during school
holiday periods.
45. Section 4 (Design Consideration) of the TIA is requested to be updated to take account
of the following factors:
a) Demonstrate that the access arrangements proposed for Lot 7 are satisfactory in
accommodating future development on the balance of Lot 7.
b) The proposed southern access arrangements for Lot 3, which eliminate the raised
central median in the access driveway, and which require the design service vehicle
to drive over the kerb in “Main Street” when departing the site, are not acceptable in
an unconstrained greenfield environment. Modify the proposed access driveway to
rectify those issues and provide a detailed layout plan depicting the proposed
driveway configuration.
c) Demonstrate satisfactory sight lines at the southern Lot 3 access driveway taking
account of the fact that on-street parking in combination with the horizontal curvature
of the road will significantly impede sight lines.
d) Demonstrate satisfactory height clearance for service vehicles accessing the
northern loading dock and loading refuse bins.
e) The proposed configuration of the northern Lots 3 access driveway, having multiple
entry and exit lanes across the verge (with a resultant 18m wide driveway crossing),
and its interaction with the balance of the ground level carpark and the adjacent
basement ramp (having insufficient queuing) will be confusing for users and is not
acceptable.
f) Assess how it is proposed to service the large retail tenancy at the south-western
corner of the site.
g) The dual entry lanes on each access to the basement carpark is suggestive of an
intent to gate the basement carpark. If that is the case, then describe and assess
how this would operate, and prepare a carpark management plan detailing pricing
strategies, staff arrangements, resident arrangements, etc, so that Council can fully
understand the implications of such a proposal.
Issue – Environmental Noise Assessment (including lighting and odour)
A review of the Environmental Noise Assessment prepared by ttm has revealed that additional
information is required to assess the application. It is also requested further advice be provided
with respect to lighting and odour/air quality impacts, which should be addressed.
Noise – Information Request.
46. Provide an updated Noise Impact Assessment report which provides assessment on the
basis of:
Page 19 of 21
Document Set ID: 22464338
Version: 2, Version Date: 17/07/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Information Request MCU23 0078 [As Published].pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 187 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.