Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

Information Request MCU23 0078 [As Published] · MCU23/0078

of 21

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                        b) Clarify the proposed arrangements for car parking provided for the residential
                           components of the development. It is currently proposed that residents will need to
                           compete with other users for car parking spaces, in circumstances where normally
                           there would be separate secured resident parking areas provided within the carpark.
                        c) The currently supplied information regarding temporal parking demands for the
                           different proposed uses in order to support the proposed parking relaxation is
                           insufficient. At a holiday destination like Noosa, parking demands for each of the
                           proposed uses can reach co-incident or near co-incident peaks during school holiday
                           periods. There is no information supplied to be able to determine whether the
                           parking demand profiles derived from Google analytics as used in the TIA are
                           representative of design parking conditions at Noosa which will occur during school
                           holiday periods.
                 45.    Section 4 (Design Consideration) of the TIA is requested to be updated to take account
                        of the following factors:
                        a) Demonstrate that the access arrangements proposed for Lot 7 are satisfactory in
                           accommodating future development on the balance of Lot 7.
                        b) The proposed southern access arrangements for Lot 3, which eliminate the raised
                           central median in the access driveway, and which require the design service vehicle
                           to drive over the kerb in “Main Street” when departing the site, are not acceptable in
                           an unconstrained greenfield environment. Modify the proposed access driveway to
                           rectify those issues and provide a detailed layout plan depicting the proposed
                           driveway configuration.
                        c) Demonstrate satisfactory sight lines at the southern Lot 3 access driveway taking
                           account of the fact that on-street parking in combination with the horizontal curvature
                           of the road will significantly impede sight lines.
                        d) Demonstrate satisfactory height clearance for service vehicles accessing the
                           northern loading dock and loading refuse bins.
                        e) The proposed configuration of the northern Lots 3 access driveway, having multiple
                           entry and exit lanes across the verge (with a resultant 18m wide driveway crossing),
                           and its interaction with the balance of the ground level carpark and the adjacent
                           basement ramp (having insufficient queuing) will be confusing for users and is not
                           acceptable.
                        f)   Assess how it is proposed to service the large retail tenancy at the south-western
                             corner of the site.
                        g) The dual entry lanes on each access to the basement carpark is suggestive of an
                           intent to gate the basement carpark. If that is the case, then describe and assess
                           how this would operate, and prepare a carpark management plan detailing pricing
                           strategies, staff arrangements, resident arrangements, etc, so that Council can fully
                           understand the implications of such a proposal.


                 Issue – Environmental Noise Assessment (including lighting and odour)
                 A review of the Environmental Noise Assessment prepared by ttm has revealed that additional
                 information is required to assess the application. It is also requested further advice be provided
                 with respect to lighting and odour/air quality impacts, which should be addressed.
                 Noise – Information Request.
                 46.    Provide an updated Noise Impact Assessment report which provides assessment on the
                        basis of:




                                                                                                         Page 19 of 21
Document Set ID: 22464338
Version: 2, Version Date: 17/07/2023

Used in these records

About this file

File size
187 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Information Request MCU23 0078 [As Published].pdf · 187 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.