REC16/0007 - Decision Notice

Officer:	Wilhelm Koschade
Direct Telephone:	07 53296215
Our Reference:	REC16/0007
Your Reference:	NA

24 May 2016

S Zauner & IA Zauner
C/- Murray & Associates (Qld) Pty Ltd
PO Box 246
NAMBOUR  QLD  4560

Dear Sir/Madam

Decision Notice
Sustainable Planning Act 2009
I refer to your application and advise that on 19 May 2016, Council decided to approve the application in full subject to conditions.
Details of the decision are as follows:
1.	APPLICATION DETAILS

Application No:	REC16/0007
Street Address:	183 Blanckensee Rd BLACK MOUNTAIN  QLD  4563
Real Property Description:	Lot 245 MCH 254 Lot 2 SP 233312
Planning Scheme:	The Noosa Plan (16 September 2013)

2.	DECISION DETAILS

The following type of approval has been issued:

Development Permit to Reconfigure a Lot - Boundary Realignment (2 Lots into 2 Lots)

3.	RELEVANT PERIOD OF APPROVAL

The relevant period for this development approval is 2 years starting the day that this development approval takes effect.

4.	ASSESSMENT MANAGER CONDITIONS

PLANNING

When Conditions Must Be Complied With
Unless otherwise stated, all works required by the conditions of this Decision Notice must be completed prior to submission of the subdivision plan to Council for compliance assessment.
Approved Plans
Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions.
Plan No.	Rev.	Plan/Document Name	Date
54649/B	B	Proposed Boundary Realignment (1/2), drawn by Murray and Associates	19/05/2016
54649/B	B	Proposed Boundary Realignment (2/2), drawn by Murray and Associates	19/05/2016
All lot numbering on the subdivision plan to be submitted to Council for compliance assessment must remain as shown on the Approved Plans.

5.	REFERRAL AGENCIES

Not Applicable.

6.	REFERENCED DOCUMENTS

Not Applicable.

7.	ADVISORY NOTES

The following notes are included for guidance and information purposes only and do not form part of the assessment manager conditions:
PLANNING
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003
There may be a requirement to establish a Cultural Heritage Management Plan and/or obtain approvals pursuant to the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (ACH Act).
The ACH Act establishes a cultural heritage duty of care which provides that: “A person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage”. It is an offence to fail to comply with the duty of care. Substantial monetary penalties may apply to individuals or corporations breaching this duty of care. Injunctions may also be issued by the Land and Resources Tribunal, and the Minister administering the ACH Act can also issue stop orders for an activity that is harming or is likely to harm Aboriginal cultural heritage or the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
You should contact the Cultural Heritage Unit on 07 3247 6212 to discuss any obligations under the ACH Act.

Infrastructure Charges
This Development Permit will not trigger an “Infrastructure Charge Notice” to be issued in accordance with Council’s “Charges Resolution” made pursuant to the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and in conjunction with the State Planning Regulatory Provision (Adopted Charges).
8.	PROPERTY NOTES

Not Applicable.

9.	PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OVERRIDING PLANNING SCHEME

Not Applicable.

10.	FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED

Compliance Assessment – Plan Sealing

11.	SELF ASSESSABLE CODES

Not Applicable.

12.	SUBMISSIONS

Not Applicable.

13.	REASONS / GROUNDS FOR APPROVAL DESPITE CONFLICT WITH SCHEME

Not Applicable.

14.	RIGHTS OF APPEAL

You are entitled to appeal against this decision.  A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is attached.

During the appeal period, you as the applicant may suspend your appeal period and make written representations to Council about the conditions contained within the development approval.  If Council agrees or agrees in part with the representations, a “negotiated decision notice” will be issued.  Only one “negotiated decision notice” may be given.  Taking this step will defer your appeal period, which will commence again from the start the day after you receive a “negotiated decision notice”.

Yours faithfully,

Wilhelm Koschade
Development Planner

	Appeal Rights SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT 2009 & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING REGULATION 2009

The following is an extract from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009  (Chapter 7).
MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE, RECONFIGURING A LOT & OPERATIONAL WORKS

Division 8 	Appeals to court relating to development applications and approvals

461 	Appeals by applicants
(1) 	An applicant for a development application may appeal to the court against any of the following—
(a) 	the refusal, or the refusal in part, of the development application;
(b) 	any condition of a development approval, another matter stated in a development approval and the identification or inclusion of a code under section 242;
(c) 	the decision to give a preliminary approval when a development permit was applied for;
(d) 	the length of a period mentioned in section 341;
(e) 	a deemed refusal of the development application.
(2) 	An appeal under subsection (1)(a), (b), (c) or (d) must be started within 20 business days (the applicant’s appeal period) after—
(a) 	if a decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given—the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant; or
(b) 	otherwise—the day a decision notice was required to be given to the applicant.
(3) 	An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be started at any time after the last day a decision on the matter should have been made.

462 	Appeals by submitters—general
(1) 	A submitter for a development application may appeal to the court only against—
(a) 	the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or
(b) 	the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327.
(2) 	To the extent an appeal may be made under subsection (1), the appeal may be against 1 or more of the following—
(a) 	the giving of a development approval;
(b) 	any provision of the approval including—
(i) 	a condition of, or lack of condition for, the approval; or
(ii) 	the length of a period mentioned in section 341 for the approval.
(3) 	However, a submitter may not appeal if the submitter—
(a) 	withdraws the submission before the application is decided; or
(b) 	has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii).
(4) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days (the submitter’s appeal period) after the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the submitter.

463 	Additional and extended appeal rights for submitters for particular development applications
(1) 	This section applies to a development application to which chapter 9, part 7 applies.
(2) 	A submitter of a properly made submission for the application may appeal to the court about a referral agency’s response made by a prescribed concurrence agency for the application.
(3) 	However, the submitter may only appeal against a referral agency’s response to the extent it relates to—
(a) 	if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (environment)—development for an aquacultural ERA; or
(b) 	if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (fisheries)—development that is—
(i) 	a material change of use of premises for aquaculture; or
(ii) 	operational work that is the removal, damage or destruction of a marine plant.
(4) 	Despite section 462(1), the submitter may appeal against the following matters for the application even if the matters relate to code assessment—
(a) 	a decision about a matter mentioned in section 462(2) if it is a decision of the chief executive (fisheries);
(b) 	a referral agency’s response mentioned in subsection (2).

464 	Appeals by advice agency submitters
(1) 	Subsection (2) applies if an advice agency, in its response for an application, told the assessment manager to treat the response as a properly made submission.
(2) 	The advice agency may, within the limits of its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about—
(a) 	any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or
(b) 	any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327.
(3) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the advice agency as a submitter.
(4) 	However, if the advice agency has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii), the advice agency may not appeal the decision.

465 	Appeals about decisions relating to extensions for approvals
(1) 	For a development approval given for a development application, a person to whom a notice is given under section 389, other than a notice for a decision under section 386(2), may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice.
(2) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.
(3) 	Also, a person who has made a request under section 383 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4)	An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made.

466 	Appeals about decisions relating to permissible changes
(1) 	For a development approval given for a development application, the following persons may appeal to the court against a decision on a request to make a permissible change to the approval—
(a) 	if the responsible entity for making the change is the assessment manager for the application—
(i) 	the person who made the request; or
(ii) 	an entity that gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-request response notice about the request;
(b) 	if the responsible entity for making the change is a concurrence agency for the application—the person who made the request.
(2) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the person is given notice of the decision on the request under section 376.
(3) 	Also, a person who has made a request under section 369 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4)	An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made.

467 	Appeals about changing or cancelling conditions imposed by assessment manager or concurrence agency
(1) 	A person to whom a notice under section 378(9)(b) giving a decision to change or cancel a condition of a development approval has been given may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice.
(2) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.

[word/footer1.xml]
Page 2 of 5

[word/footer2.xml]
PO Box 141		P. (07) 5329 6500	[email protected]	
	TEWANTIN  QLD  4565	F. (07) 5329 6501	www.noosa.qld.gov.au
				Page 1 of 5

[word/header1.xml]
REC16/0007

[Attachment: image4.png (image text)]
 
 
 

 
 
 

a
mm

  

NOOSA
COUNCIL