Council archive · source document
14169-001-Rev0 17 Webb Rd -Revised Draft · 132002.220527.1
Attached to the e-mail 132002.220527.1 Change to Existing Approval Engineering & Geo tech reports (1of 6 emails).
17 WEBB ROAD, SUNSHINE BEACH PROPOSED RESIDENCE Considering the existing site conditions, and subject to the implementation of recommendations given in Section 7, it is our opinion that there is a Low (L) Risk of global slope instability affecting the proposed residence. Regulators (NSC) normally require that a Very Low or Low Risk of landslide affecting property must be demonstrated to enable development approval. Summarised in Table 2 below is our qualitative assessment of landslide risk for the site. A summary of qualitative terminology for use in assessing risk to property is attached in Appendix C (taken from AGS 2007). Table 2: Details of Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (AGS 2007) Assessed Hazard Likelihood Consequence Risk Comments The likelihood of a failure through the medium dense sands is assessed as Unlikely due to the low 1: Localised landslide through to moderate gradients, lack of groundwater and medium dense to dense sands effective friction angle of the sand. Numerical on 15° to 20° slope near house, Unlikely Medium Low modelling (Ref. Section 6.2.2) also indicates that an with slide extending below the acceptable factor of safety against instability for this foundation depth scenario will be attained. Although the consequence of instability could be Medium, the resultant risk is Low as per AGS 2007. Based upon current climatic conditions, it would be Barely Credible that the 20 m to 30 m distant foredune slope could be eroded to such an extent 2: Significant retrogressive failure of foredune due to erosion of toe during a high sea event(s) leading to undermining of house Rare T Major Low that the house could be undermined. However, depending on the extent of sea level rise and possible climate change over the design life of the AF building (at least 50 years), the likelihood of such a foundations failure could increase to Rare. Combined with a Major consequence of such instability, the resultant risk is Low as per AGS 2007. Note: Barely Credible = the event is inconceivable or fanciful over the design life Rare = the event is conceivable but only under exceptional circumstances over the design life R 6.2.2 Quantitative Assessment D In order to calculate the factor of safety (FOS) against slope instability for the proposed residence, numerical analysis has been conducted using the Slope/W computer program for the assumed ‘worst case’ conditions. We have assumed a ground surface profile of 10° through the building area, increasing to 20° for a 2 m high slope, then flattening to 10°. The analysed subsurface profile comprises medium dense sand to 1 m depth, then becoming dense sand. Note that we have not analysed the stability of the foredune slope as this is located well east of the proposed house on public land. As recommended in Section 7, footings and retaining walls will be founded in medium dense (or denser) sands. A surcharge load of 20 kPa has been applied to replicate the proposed construction, which is equivalent to a two storey house or 1m depth of fill. No groundwater was encountered at the time of investigation. However, as a conservative measure to account for possible ‘worst case’ transient (short-term) conditions, a piezometric groundwater level has been included in the model at a depth of 1 m BGL. Results of the numerical slope stability analysis are illustrated in Text Figure 10. The key points from our analysis are summarised as follows: Shear strength and unit weight parameters adopted were based upon drained (or effective) soil shear strength parameters taken from the values recommended for similar materials in Appendix D of Australian Standard AS4678-2002 ‘Earth Retaining Structures’. Analysis was undertaken for a specified range of slip circle centroids and radii. Text Figure 10 shows the slip circle with the lowest FOS value. Coloured zones indicate FOS contours. For long-term (drained) conditions, the minimum calculated FOS is 2.1. 26 February 2015 Report No. 14169-001-Rev0 9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
14169-001-Rev0 17 Webb Rd -Revised Draft.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.