Information Request MCU23 0008 [As Published] · MCU23/0008

                 Issue – Crossover & Pram Ramp Separation
                 There is no separation between the proposed driveway crossover and existing pedestrian
                 pram ramp. Council is concerned this lack of separation may compromise pedestrian safety
                 and results in a large expanse of concrete across the frontage.
                 Information Required
                 11.    Provide amended plans demonstrating that the location of the proposed crossover has
                        suitable separation and will not compromise the safety of pedestrians waiting to cross
                        Rufous Street at the existing pedestrian pram ramp. The amended plans must be
                        prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of
                        Queensland).


                 Issue – Discharge Point of Proposed Grate Drain
                 SCG Consulting’s Concept Stormwater Management Plan (32304-C3.1) dated December
                 2022 does not demonstrate how stormwater collected by the proposed grate drain will
                 discharge.
                 Information Required
                 12.    Provide an amended plan demonstrating where the proposed grate drain will discharge
                        to. The amended plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ –
                        Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland).


                 Issue – ‘Small Car’ Carpark
                 SCG Consulting’s Concept Stormwater Management Plan (32304-C3.1) dated December
                 2022 notes that two of the northern Car Stackers are for ‘Small Cars’. This is not noted in
                 Black Wood Architecture’s or Fernway Engineering’s plans and Council believes this is an
                 error.
                 Information Required
                 13.    Provide an amended Concept Stormwater Management Plan that removes the ‘Small
                        Car’ annotations.
                 14.    If the ‘Small Car’ annotation is intended, provide additional detail demonstrating how this
                        affects the functionality of the carpark as described in Sections 5.4 and 6.0 of Fernway
                        Engineering’s Traffic Impact Statement dated December 2022.


                 Issue - Landscaping
                 The proposal plans do not demonstrate the necessary landscape area to ensure appropriate
                 levels of screening and buffer can occur that suits the relative size and nature of the
                 development and reduce the visual impacts of the bulky nature of the development. Refer
                 PO10 of the Business Activities code and the Landscaping Code and The design has not
                 provided meaningful dimensioned areas of landscape area along the front, side and rear
                 boundaries capable of supporting mature screening vegetation for the longevity of the
                 development.
                 Information Required
                 15.    Provide detailed landscape concept plans prepared by a suitably qualified landscape
                        architect in accordance with the requirements of the PSP2 – Landscaping, and that
                        incorporate the following:




                                                                                                           Page 5 of 6
Document Set ID: 22290166
Version: 4, Version Date: 07/03/2023