Original source · versioned page text
05. Hales - Planning Report
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW20/0117 - 37 Mossman Crt Noosa Heads.
PROJECT URBAN – 20153 13 Jul 2020
7.0 PRESCRIBED TIDAL WORKS
7.1 PRESCRIBED TIDAL WORKS CODE
The proposal complies with the Acceptable Solutions of the Prescribed Tidal Works Code as demonstrated
in the table below.
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
Character & Amenity (generally) – Prescribed Tidal Work in a Canal
1.1 Prescribed tidal works in a The design and construction of the Compliant
canal are compatible with its prescribed tidal work is consistent with the
location, having regard to the following standards:- The proposed works are
following:- a) subject to paragraph (c), prescribed consistent with the Mossman
a) the character and Court and Witta Circle maritime
tidal work does not extend past the
development.
amenity of the work’s side boundary or extended side
immediate surroundings boundary of the lot connected to the The jetty does not extend
and the locality within work; within 3m of the prolongations
which the work is located; b) subject to paragraph (c):- of the boundaries in
b) if the relevant planning i) for prescribed tidal works for a accordance with Council
planning scheme.
scheme states the private purpose – the works are
desired character or not roofed; or The proposed works are not
amenity for the work’s ii) for prescribed tidal works for a roofed.
immediate surrounds or non-private purpose – the works
the locality within which are not roofed unless they are the
the work is located – the main access to land;
stated desired character c) if a relevant planning scheme standard
or amenity. is more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) – the
relevant planning scheme standard, to
the extend it is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
or (b);
d) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent with
the standards mentioned in
paragraphs (a) to (c)
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
Character & Amenity (generally) – Prescribed Tidal Work NOT in a Canal
2.1 Prescribed tidal works not The design and construction of the Not applicable
in a canal are compatible with prescribed tidal work is consistent with the
its location, having regard to following standards:- The proposed works are
the following – a) subject to paragraph (d), prescribed located within a canal.
a) the character and tidal works do not extend past the side
amenity of the work’s boundary or extended side boundary
immediate surrounds of the lot connected to the work;
Development Assessment Report Page 13 of 42
Operational Works
37 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.