Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

1909-13367 SRA referral response approved docs

Attached to the e-mail SARA Referral agency response – with conditions - MCU19/0114 & RAL19/0027.

of 146

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (31.2 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Table 4 – Time of concentration summary

                                 Time of Concentration                    Adopted Parameters
          Method Used
                                       (Minutes)


                                                                               Figure 4.5

                                                          L = 4640m; Fall = 49m, delta = varies between 2 and 3

                                                                             t= 145 minutes
   Figures 4.5/4.6 QUDM 2017              153
                                                                               Figure 4.6

                                                                           L = 50m, n = 0.035

                                                                         S = 18%, t= 8.0 minutes


    Bransby-Williams (Equ 4.9                                           L = 4.6km; A = 386.98Ha
                                          166
           QUDM 2017)                                                         Se = 0.562%


The lengths of each catchment used were taken as the longest flow path from the top of the external
catchment to the discharge point at the end of the study area. The lengths and the slopes of the bed
were determined from LIDAR information.

Equal area slope was determined using a longitudinal section of the creek bed.

Using the above times of concentration the rational method was used to calculate an estimate of peak
flow.

Below is a list of the parameters that were used to determine the peak flow of the external catchments
based on the time of concentrations detailed above.


          C10 combined = 0.74

          I100 2.55hrs = 61.8mm/hr

          I100 2.77hrs = 59.2mm/hr

          The above parameters have been used to calculate the below peak catchment flows.

          1% AEP Peak flow2.55 hours = (1.2 x 0.74 x 0.0618m/hr x 3,869,800m2)/3600 = 58.99m3/s

          1% AEP Peak flow2.77 hours = (1.2 x 0.74 x 0.0592m/hr x 3,869,800m 2)/3600 = 56.51m 3/s

The 1% peak flows calculated using the rational method are approximately 0.8% (2.77 hour tc) and
5.3% (2.55 hour tc) greater than the 1% peak flow as determined using the Laurenson’s method. This
difference has been attributed to the runoff routing within Laurensons method combined with the
detention in the 1D channels which the rational method does not consider.

3.1.9 2D M odel lin g p a ra m e t e rs

The external catchment and development site flows have been modelled in 2D to determine the existing
flow conditions, peak water levels, maximum flow velocities and extent of flow widths adjacent to the
development site.




                                                 Flood Study                                                      14
S19-007                                   122 & 144 Myall St, Cooroy
Log in to download the original file

1909-13367 SRA referral response approved docs.pdf · 31.2 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.