Original source · versioned page text
2021-11-15 General Committee Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 15 NOVEMBER 2021
Community comments Proposed response
Council needs to formally withdraw its letter to appropriate provisions so that the risks posed by
the State that foreshadows adverse planning the hazards are avoided or mitigated to protect
changes, as it is clearly inconsistent with the people and property.
stated intent of Council not to negatively impact
Noosa Council therefore must meet the Minister’
existing homes and property rights.
requirements that were set when the Noosa Plan
2020 was approved by the State Government to
appropriately integrate the State Planning Policy
into the Noosa Plan 2020. The letter notifying the
State that Council wishes to commence a process
of amending the planning scheme to meet these
requirements is a standard planning process. The
details of the amendment have not yet been
drafted in full and will be the subject of further
separate community consultation once they are
more progressed and once the CHAP is complete.
Risk assessment
Table 11 - Change in Teewah Beach and Noosa Risk table has now been changed to show that
North Shore asset erosion risk profiles - Asset the business asset type is not applicable for
Type ‘Business’ does not exist. Either remove Teewah and Noosa North Shore beach. This is
from table or change Risk to none. There are because short term accommodation is captured
different risk profiles between Residential and under ‘Residential’ and the campground is
Tourism. Tourism in Teewah is based upon captured under ‘Tourism’.
rental homes. The risk profile should be the
same for both in the township.
Inundation Risk to Noosa North Shore – amend Reviewed and changes made to reflect suggested
wording: 'This area is prone to flooding and wording.
inundation events today, and these hazards are
projected to increase in severity and frequency
over the life of this plan’. This statement is
incorrect. Similar to sections of the foreshore of
Noosaville as an example, at times of king tides
or minor flooding, the lower reaches also have
some minor known areas of which can become
inundated. The area is not ‘prone’ today as
suggested. The wording should be changed to –
“some areas do experience inundation as a
result of king tides and minor flooding, however
most residences are not affected”.
Management of public land
Welcome Council’s approach to managing The CHAP acknowledges the need for a pro-
dunes and beaches and the critical role this active approach to dune and beach management
plays in help to provide protection against that recognises the importance of managing
coastal erosion. erosion risk through on-ground management
action and systematic monitoring and data
gathering over time.
Council must properly manage land adjacent to Council is preparing a Coastal Foreshores
the beach for which it is responsible.
Management Plan for Eastern Beaches with
More detail about the investment and oversight
reference to the intent and required actions of the
of dune, beach and waterway management
CHAP and the Bushland Reserve Strategic
needs to be developed and published ahead of
the other longer term pathway options.
Page 30 of 58
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.