09/1058 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132009.1058

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22

 

 

 

SECTION 2 - Section 2 must be completed when the application seeks approval to make a material change of use of premises.

 

 

 

 

 

ISTATE PLANNING REGULATORY PROVISIONS AND PLANNING SCHEME |
21 Is the proposed use assessable under any State planning :cyutatory provisions?
No (Yes
If no, is the proposed use assessable under the planning scheme?
LJ No - Goto 02.2 Yes - Complete Form 1, Part D and answer Q2.1.1 - 2.1.13 below
‘STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD | ]
2.1.1 Is any part of the premises located in part of a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State-controlled road?
C1 Yes No
If no, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified
threshold?

No — ([] Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, items Ta) and 3

‘ACID'SULFATE SOILS #3 - ee RES SEES ee ~ aE pe cma ad
2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local goverment area Tsted?' in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils?

No -Gotoa21.3 ([] Yes
21 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Burnett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Coaloola, Douglas,

Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Mornington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday

   

iP Regulation, scheduie 2. table 3, item 4: State Planning Policy 2°02: Planning and Managing Development Invaiving Acid Sulfate Soils, seciion 3.6

COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRIC.©) ae ae |
2.1.3 Is any part of the premises located in a coastal management district?
(J No - Goto.02.1.4 Yes
If yes, will the proposed use involve the following?
(i) Carrying out operational work, completely or partly in the coastal management district {] No Yes

(ii) Carrying out building work, completely or partly in the coastal management district, that is the [x] No O Yes
construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m2

(iii) Carrying out building work, completely or partly in the coastal management district, that is the [x] No Yes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?

 

 

 

tf yes to any one of (i) - (iii) above - This application must be referred to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Concurrence Agency.
{P Reguiation, schedule 2. table 3, item 6

 

 

VEGETATIONCLEARING —Ssss—Cs~‘“~;~‘S;C;*;‘;C;~;CSSCCOCSCSS |
2.1.4 Do the premises include a lot containing the following?

{i} Acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) [) No O Yes

{ii) If there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation —) No 0 Yes

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2. tem 17

 

‘CONTAMINATED LAND |- UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE

2.1.5 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance?

 

[x] [X] No - Go to 02.1.6 O Yes - (Complete Form 1, Past N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence

Agency.
iP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3, iter 12

If yes, do the following apply?

{i) The application is for a proposed use assessable under the planning scheme CINo LD Yes
{ii) The application is for development outside a rural precinct?2, or if in a rural precinct, it is ON OY
inconsistent with the rural precinct es

2.2 Rural precinct has the meaning given in the draft SEQ Regional Plan 2009-2031 Regulatory Provisions