Council archive · source document
09/1058 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132009.1058
“ surrounding development; b) does not present an appearance of bulk to adjacent properties, roads or other areas in the vicinity of the site; c) maximises the retention of existing vegetation and allows for soft landscaping between buildings; d) allows for adequate area at ground level for outdoor recreation, entertainment, clothes drying and other site facilities; and e) facilitates on-site stormwater management and vehicular access. b) The incorporation of lightweight materials and natural muted tones softens th- bulk of the proposal. Further the ‘split’ of the building into two pavilions minimises the visual scale of the dwelling and its appearance of bulk from adjoining residences. !n addition the incorporation of fins and apertures along the side elevations of the proposed dwelling creates a sense of permeability, thereby reducing the building bulk. c) As previously detailed the cantilevered design of key building elements ensures the establishment of extensive vegetation across the site. d) The architect has given careful consideration to the usability of the dwelling, accordingly large areas of outdoor spaces are provided for active purposes. e) The large areas of open space facilitate stormwater management and adequate vehicle access. Roof Form The design philosophy of the proposed dwelling's roof form is best articulated by the architect: Although the two external longitudinal elevations do not have eaves the ‘internal’ longitudinal and shorter elevations of each pavilion have generous ‘tropical scaled’ eaves. The north west elevation is animated through a series of shutters which allow views and air flow in good weather yet allow the house to be closed down in inclement weather — when the inhabitants can retreat to the protection of the central out door room. The south east elevation is also articulated through the incorporation of a series of timber blades. 66% of the external walls of the building have eaves, all of which are greater than 600mm. The other 34% of the external walls consist of the architectural gesture of the folded ‘roof / walls which give the building it's unique aesthetic. An aesthetic which is complimentary, both to the natural landscape as well as the sub tropical beachside nature of the locality. Detached Housing Code we sod, 014 Roof forms— a) contribute positively to the local skyline; b) complement the low density character of the locality; traditional Queensland architecture. c) do not present an appearance of Accordingly they contribute positively to excessive bulk to side neighbours (eg. avoid | current design trends of the Eastern Beaches low pitched roofs or box profiles/parapets); locality. d) use simple traditional roof designs; e) offer shading to the walls and windows of the dwelling unit; a) The floating skillion roof forms of the proposal are modern representations of b) The pavilion form of the proposed dwelling is similar with recent surrounding development and accords with the low
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
09/1058 - MCU - Detached House [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.