Council archive · source document
17365_Council_Information response_220518 · MCU18/0019
Attached to the e-mail Response to Info Request (Info Response & Amended Proposal Plans Part 1) - MCU18/0019.
Issue –Val Crescent Driveway Levels
The proposed RL of 4.372 on the property line at the Val Crescent driveway does not appear to match
with the existing 5.0m and 4.5m contours either side of the driveway.
Information requested
9. Please provide section plans of the proposed Val Crescent driveway demonstrating how the
driveway satisfactorily interacts with the existing kerb level, complies with the relevant Australian
Standards and the pedestrian sight splay recommended in the QTraffic report.
Response
Refer attached traffic engineering response prepared by Q Traffic.
Issue –Driveway layout and basement gate
The parking layout plan does not include dimensions.
There is potential for conflict between vehicles entering the basement and service vehicles using the
delivery/loading area.
The basement access shows a gate which may restrict visitor access.
Information requested
10. Please provide:
10.1. a dimensioned parking layout plan demonstrating the details outlined in Section 3.3 of the
QTraffic report;
10.2. a modified driveway layout that ensures that the swept path of the design vehicle
(including clearances) remains within the proposed driveway area (refer to QTraffic plan
755_KNG03 SK.02 A);
10.3. a plan with the clear delineation of the access to the basement carpark clear of the loading
area, so that all users are able to distinguish how that area will operate in an obvious
manner; and
10.4. details of the hours of operation of the basement gate (open all hours, only open during
day light hours, or closed at all times and only opened when required?). If the gate is to
remain closed for any part of the day or night identify how users, including visitors, will
satisfactorily gain access at those times. Investigate moving the gate to allow unrestricted
access to some car parks and a disabled space on entry to the basement.
Response
Refer attached traffic engineering response prepared by Q Traffic.
Issue –Built form and streetscape
The proposal sits within a low density residential area characterised by single and 2 storey dwelling
houses up to 8m in height. Opposite the site is a single storey hospital in a bushland setting.
Although the Goodchap Street elevation is articulated, it is still a large building within a low density
residential setting.
The proposal presents a box type profile to Goodchap Street. The planning scheme seeks to avoid box
type designs by requiring the use of eaves, roof pitch and a variety of materials to provide interest to
the street and achieve a sub-tropical design.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
17365_Council_Information response_220518.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 196 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.