Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

08/0803 - MCU - Multiple Housing Type 2 - Duplex [As Published] · 132008.803

of 60

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

  

Column 1
Specific Outcomes
alignment — 2 storeys, or
e balance area of site — 4 storeys
with a 3 storey presentation to
the beach; or
B. Southern side of Hastings Street—
e within 10m of the Hastings St or
Noosa Drive alignments— 2
storeys; or
« balance area of site — 4 storeys,
or
For Attached Housing Zone — 3
storeys with the exception of Lot 4 on
SP 100064 in Serenity Close, where a
maximum height of 4 storeys is
permitted; or
iv For any other zone— 2 storeys;
c) do not visually dominate the street or
surrounding spaces;
d) preserve the amenity of surrounding land;
e) respect the scale of surrounding vegetation;
f) respond to the topography of the site by
minimising cut and fill (eg. stepping down the
site or using a suspended pole construction);
and
g) maintain a mature vegetated skyline.

 

    

Column 2

Probable Solutions (if code assessable)
A. within 10m of the Hastings St or

Noosa Drive alignments — 6m;

B. balance area of site — 15m; or

c) for Attached Housing Zone—12m with the
exception of Lot 4 on SP 100064 in Serenity

Close, where a maximum height of 15m is

permitted; or
d) for any other zone— 8m;

   

  

Column 3
Compliance

 

 

Setbacks

08 Buildings and other structures are

appropriately designed and sited to—

a) provide amenity for users of the premises as
well as preserve the visual and acoustic
amenity of adjoining and nearby prope

b) preserve any existing vegetation that will buffer
the proposed building;

c) allow for landscaping to be provided between
buildings;

d) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of
buildings and landscape elements within the
street;

e) protect public safety and property within
erosion prone areas by ensuring such areas

 

 

$8.1 Buildings and structures comply with the
minimum setbacks identified in Schedule 1 -

 

 

The proposal generally complies with the
required setbacks except in relation to the rear
setback.

The applicant proposes a setback of 4.6
metres to an open deck of the upper levels of
the building whereas the probable solutions
indicate a setback of 6.0 metres.

The reduced setback is considered to fulfil the
Specific Outcomes in the following manner:

a) the rear boundary adjoins public parkland
and the development will not impact on the

 

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.0 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_0803 - MCU - Multiple Housing Type 2 - Duplex [As Published].pdf · 3.0 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.