Rpt-Proposed Lots 17 - 19, 28 Eenie Creek Rd, Noosaville_FINAL_

9.          MATTERS PRESCRIBED BY REGULATION
Pursuant to Section 45(5) of the PA, the assessment of Impact Assessable applications:
     (a) Must be carried out –
         (i)    Against the assessment benchmarks in a categorising instrument for the development; and
         (ii)   Having regard to any matters prescribed by regulation for this subparagraph.
The matters prescribed by regulation referred to in Section 45(5)(a)(ii) are contained within Section 31 of the
Planning Regulation 2017, which are listed and discussed in further detail below.

   9.1       SCHEDULES 9 AND 10 OF THE PLANNING REGULATION 2017
Schedule 9 of the Planning Regulation 2017 relates to building work. The building work is not identified as
requiring referral under Schedule 9.
Schedule 10 of the Planning Regulation 2017 applies to state matters that trigger assessment against the
State Development Assessment Provisions (‘SDAP’) and referral to the State Assessment and Referral
Agency (‘SARA’).
An assessment of the application against Schedule 10 and the SDAP has determined that the proposal does
requires referral to SARA as a Referral Agency and Energex as an Advice Agency.

   9.2 SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND REGIONAL PLAN 2017
Section 2.2. of the Noosa Plan 2020 confirms that the planning scheme appropriately advances the
ShapingSEQ as it applies to the planning scheme area. Accordingly, further assessment against the relevant
assessment benchmarks contained in Shaping SEQ is not required for this development.

   9.3 THE STATE PLANNING POLICY
Section 2.1 of the Noosa Plan 2020 confirms that all state interests in the SPP are appropriately integrated
into planning scheme with the exception of the following:
     “State interest – Natural hazards, risk and resilience – Coastal Hazards – in part
The site is not identified within a coastal hazard area in the SPP mapping. Accordingly, all relevant state
interests are appropriately integrated into City Plan 2014. The SPP is therefore not a relevant assessment
benchmark for the purpose of assessing this development application.

   9.4 DESIGNATIONS
The application does not involve a designation, nor is the site subject to a designation. Therefore, there are
no designations relevant for assessment.

   9.5 TEMPORARY STATE PLANNING POLICIES
The site is not subject to any temporary State Planning Policies.

   9.6 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN
The Noosa Local Government Infrastructure Plan (‘LGIP’) integrates and coordinates land use planning and
infrastructure planning and ensures that trunk infrastructure is planned and provided in an efficient and
orderly manner. As noted above in Section 7.8, trunk infrastructure completed within the LGIP is in the
process of being delivered pursuant to the existing ROL permit. No trunk infrastructure will be prejudiced, or
required, as a consequence of the proposed development.

   9.7 CURRENT APPROVALS AND LAWFUL USES
Any development approval for, and any lawful use of, the premises or adjacent premises is to be considered
in the assessment of the application. The proposal has been designed to consider all current development
approvals and lawful uses of land surrounding the site. Accordingly, development has been designed to


URBIS
RPT-PROPOSED LOTS 17 - 19, 28 EENIE CREEK RD, NOOSAVILLE_FINAL                 MATTERS PRESCRIBED BY REGULATION   49