Original source · versioned page text
ASTP-Resp_To_IR.pdf
The proposed development, including the proposed proposal, clearly satisfies the above overall
outcomes given:
• The proposed dwelling is setback 6.0m from the rear boundary;
• The proposed pool, associated fencing and surroundings are within the 6.0m rear setback,
yet allow for natural process of erosion and accretion to occur and will not worsening or
hinder such process;
• The proposed design of the dwelling and pool responds to the characteristics of the site,
including its slope and will not adversely impact on the natural landscape nor will it adversely
affect costal processes of hazard risk;
• The proposed location of the pool is completely consistent with that of nearby residential
development; and,
• The proposed location of the pool will have no impact on the visual character and scenic
amenity of the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Area.
Setting the pool back 6m from the rear boundary will provide no benefit and improved outcome in
relation to those overall outcomes sought by the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code.
It is therefore requested that the proposed pool location be supported.
ITEM – SECONDARY DWELLING
The proposed development includes two separate self-contained living areas. With a self-
contained component on the ground floor (refer dwg DD-2.01 Rev 3) and a second (primary)
living area for Level’s 1 & 2 (refer dwg. DD-2.02 Rev.3 & dwg. DD-2.03 Rev.3). Noting the
above, Council considers the proposal currently includes an internal secondary dwelling
component.
Note: Council would consider a smaller ‘wet bar’ to the ground level in lieu of a full
kitchenette if the applicant does not wish to propose a secondary dwelling.
Information Required
12. Provide an amended plan which removes the ‘Kitchenette’ detail from Dwg. DD-
2.01 Rev.3; or
13. Provide an amended plan which swaps the ‘Kitchenette’ for a smaller scale ‘Wet
Bar’ on Dwg. DD-2.01 Rev.3; or
14. Incorporate a ‘Secondary Dwelling’ component to the application material ensuring
adequate justification is provided against the relevant outcomes.
RESPONSE
There is no intention to have a secondary dwelling onsite. The previously described kitchenette has been
changed to “wet bar” and will function accordingly. Refer to the enclosed amended plans prepared by DCM
(Attachment 1).
Page 7 of 9
Our ref: 241021
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (ASTP-Resp_To_IR.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.