Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

ASTP-Resp_To_IR.pdf

of 9
The proposed development, including the proposed proposal, clearly satisfies the above overall
outcomes given:
     •    The proposed dwelling is setback 6.0m from the rear boundary;
     •    The proposed pool, associated fencing and surroundings are within the 6.0m rear setback,
          yet allow for natural process of erosion and accretion to occur and will not worsening or
          hinder such process;
     •    The proposed design of the dwelling and pool responds to the characteristics of the site,
          including its slope and will not adversely impact on the natural landscape nor will it adversely
          affect costal processes of hazard risk;
     •    The proposed location of the pool is completely consistent with that of nearby residential
          development; and,
     •    The proposed location of the pool will have no impact on the visual character and scenic
          amenity of the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Area.

Setting the pool back 6m from the rear boundary will provide no benefit and improved outcome in
relation to those overall outcomes sought by the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code.
It is therefore requested that the proposed pool location be supported.



            ITEM – SECONDARY DWELLING
            The proposed development includes two separate self-contained living areas. With a self-
            contained component on the ground floor (refer dwg DD-2.01 Rev 3) and a second (primary)
            living area for Level’s 1 & 2 (refer dwg. DD-2.02 Rev.3 & dwg. DD-2.03 Rev.3). Noting the
            above, Council considers the proposal currently includes an internal secondary dwelling
            component.

            Note: Council would consider a smaller ‘wet bar’ to the ground level in lieu of a full
            kitchenette if the applicant does not wish to propose a secondary dwelling.

            Information Required
                 12. Provide an amended plan which removes the ‘Kitchenette’ detail from Dwg. DD-
                     2.01 Rev.3; or
                 13. Provide an amended plan which swaps the ‘Kitchenette’ for a smaller scale ‘Wet
                     Bar’ on Dwg. DD-2.01 Rev.3; or
                 14. Incorporate a ‘Secondary Dwelling’ component to the application material ensuring
                     adequate justification is provided against the relevant outcomes.

RESPONSE
There is no intention to have a secondary dwelling onsite. The previously described kitchenette has been
changed to “wet bar” and will function accordingly. Refer to the enclosed amended plans prepared by DCM
(Attachment 1).




                                                                                                             Page 7 of 9
Our ref: 241021

Log in to download the original (ASTP-Resp_To_IR.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.