Council archive · source document
Attachment 5 - Servicability Report · MCU23/0078
Very large file (21.0 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 53, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
NOOSA CITY PLAN - WATER QUALITY AND DRAINAGE CODE Job Ref No.: 22159
Performance Outcomes and Acceptable Solution
Table 9.4.8.3 – CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT
PO7 AO7.1 PO
Water quality treatment systems use Water quality treatment systems are Water quality treatment systems are designed to be
natural processes and materials, designed to be integrated into the integrated into the landscape consistent with the
whenever possible, and are integrated landscape consistent with the technical technical design guideline.
into development to enhance design guideline published by Healthy Land
biodiversity and landscape benefits. and Water Water by Design for the feature. Refer to Bornhorst and Ward SBSMP report for
(eg. For Bioretention Basins: Bioretention details.
Technical Design Guidelines (October 2014)
and for Wetland Systems the Wetland
Technical Design Guideline (May 2017).
AO8.1
PO8 Detailed life cycle costing is provided for the
Water quality treatment infrastructure entire treatment train system including Water quality treatment systems are dedicated as
to be dedicated as public assets are replacement costs of asset parts. public assets and proven to be suitable for its use and
proven to be suitable for its use and of of a cost effective and efficient standard.
a cost effective and efficient standard. AO8.2
Treatment systems dedicated as public PO Refer to Bornhorst and Ward SBSMP report for
assets are designed to minimise details.
maintenance, renewal and adaptation costs
and the requirement for specialised
equipment, material or maintenance
techniques.
AO8.3
Vegetated stormwater management systems
to be dedicated as public assets are
established and maintained during the
maintenance period to ensure optimal
vegetated growth and that the functional
elements of the system achieve the design
function at the end of the maintenance
period
1. Solution: PO = Performance Outcome
A/O = Acceptable Outcome
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
Noosa Civic Village Mixed Use Development, Noosaville
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Attachment 5 - Servicability Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 21.0 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.