Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

Information Response

of 5

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

to ceiling height of 2.7 metres;                                        ● Provides a floor to ceiling
and                                                                       height of 2.65m on the
10.     enables           efficient                                       upper level and 2.9m on the
operation and use of the building.                                        lower level;
                                                                        ● Provides operable windows
Editor's Note: Refer to Figure                                            to enable occupants to
9.4.6.4.                                                                  control impacts of the
                                                                          weather as necessary.


Item 8

Please demonstrate the design vehicle can still manoeuvre onsite and leave in a forward
gear with a second vehicle in each garage and without encroaching into the front
landscaping or alternatively reposition the footprint of the dwelling to allow more space for
manoeuvring at the front.

Response: Please refer to the Engineering RFI Response Letter and revised Engineering Plans prepared
by Westera Partners.

Item 9

Please demonstrate the development and filling of the site will not create off-site
stormwater impacts (ponding or diversion of overland flow paths onto adjoining properties)
and/or include appropriate stormwater drainage infrastructure to convey stormwater from
adjoining properties, through the site and to the lawful point of discharge.

Response: Please refer to the Engineering RFI Response Letter and revised Engineering Plans prepared
by Westera Partners.

Item 10

Please provide a preliminary earthworks plan that indicates the volume of fill required for
the site and where necessary (if fill volume triggers the requirement against the Acid Sulfate
Soil Overlay Code), provide an Acid Sulfate Soil Management Plan prepared by an RPEQ that
provides recommendations to address the potential risks associated with the fill works.

Response: Please refer to the Engineering RFI Response Letter and revised Engineering Plans prepared
by Westera Partners.

Item 11

With existing features restricting the width of the verge area available for a 3.0m wide
footpath, please amend the engineering plan(s) to include a 2.0m wide footpath across the
frontage of the development.

Response: Please refer to the Engineering RFI Response Letter and revised Engineering Plans prepared
by Westera Partners.

For the reasons outlined above, we consider the proposed plan revisions acceptable and request that
Council proceed to issue an approval.

Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.



                                                                                                          4
Log in to download the original file

Information Response.pdf · 334 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.