Council archive · source document
Appendix 5. Geotechnical Engineering Report [As Published] · 132007.2399
Page 1 20f5 Work Order : EBO711624 Client ; GOLDER ASSOCIATES Project : 077682076 STARCO SUBDIV NOOSA SPRINGS meena aetna NNN NNN NNN CCCI General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. Where moisture determination has been preformed, results are reported on a dry weight basis. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. Key: Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process fot CAS Number = Chemistry Abstract Services number LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference # = Indicates failed QC
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix 5. Geotechnical Engineering Report [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.