Council archive · source document
Geotechnical Stability Report · OPW24/0017
GMW Projects Pty Ltd 24008-001-Rev0
31 January 2024
Table 3: Retaining Structure Design Parameters
Lateral earth pressure coefficients
Unit Friction
Retained material weight angle Ø Ko
Ka
(kN/m3) (°) (Non-yielding Kp
(Cantilever wall)
wall)
Very Loose/ Loose
17 28 0.36 0.53 2.77
Sands
Medium Dense (or
18 33 0.29 0.46 3.39
Denser) Sands
Future Fill * * * * *
Note: * depends on fill material type and level of compaction
As a minimum, retaining structures must be founded as per the recommendations in Section 4.3 above with
the footings also designed to account for lateral loads imposed by the retaining wall. Detailed design must
include an assessment of internal and global stability, together with required bearing capacity and founding
depth, by the retaining wall design engineer.
4.5 Drainage
Surface diversion drainage should be constructed above the crest of any new cut or fill embankment (e.g.
grassed or landscaped swales or diversion mounds). Adequate site drainage must be installed to ensure
that stormwater runoff is directed away from buildings, walls and footings. Although unlikely, if groundwater
seepage is encountered during excavations, Tectonic must be notified to assess the impact on stability.
Subsurface drainage must be installed behind any retaining walls (e.g. slotted ‘aggi’ pipe wrapped in filter
‘sock’ placed in gravel backfill). Depending on matters such as the extent of drainage installed and site-
specific groundwater conditions, the designer must make an assessment of hydrostatic pressure to be
accounted for in the design of the retaining structure. It is assumed that the pool floor will have a hydrostatic
pressure relief valve, which must daylight at the ground surface away from the proposed and existing
footings.
All excess stormwater collected around the residence (including overflow from rainwater tanks, pool etc.)
must be directed by pipes or lined channels to discharge at least 5 m downslope of any structure or
embankment and towards the vegetated Reserve Area to the east.
Subsurface disposal of stormwater, such as by an infiltration pit, must not be undertaken.
5.0 CONCLUSION
It is assessed that there would be a Low Risk to the proposed extensions and carport from slope instability
subject to implementation of the recommendations given in this report.
12/13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.