Council archive · source document
Development Application part 2 Report/Plans - MCU11/0254
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (41.8 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
Original PDF page 98, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Metrosideros vitiensis Fiji Fire Michelia figo Nandina domestica Pandanus spp Pandorea jasminoides Philodendron xanadu Photinia Red Robin Randia fitzalanii Ravena rivularis Syzgium hybrids Trachelospermum jasminoides Tristaniopsis laurina Tulbagia violacea Waterhousia floribunda Wodyetia bifurcata Xanthostemon chrysanthus Yucca elephantipes Please note that additional species may be suitable. Contact Covey Associates if alternative species are proposed. Bioretention macrophyte species may be chosen as per the Healthy Waterways Technical Design Guidelines. REFERENCES Ellis, P. & Sullivan, A. (2004). The Significance of Suburban Fuels. Client report for fire management unit department of urban services ACT government. CSIRO Ramsay, C. & Rudolph, L. (2003). Landscaping and Building Design for Bushfire Prone Areas. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood Victoria. Standards Australia (2009). Australian Standard AS3959-2009 incorporating amendment Nos 1, 2 and 3: Construction of Buildings in Bushfire Prone Areas. SAI Global Sydney NSW.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application part 2 Report/Plans - MCU11/0254Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 41.8 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.